"Y, what do you think about what X just said?” Conversation analysis of stance-eliciting questions in open dialogue network meetings

Camilla Rossen*, Karen Schriver, Christel Tarber, Dorthe Vedel Nordahl, Grethe Thygesen Rasmussen, Ben Ong, Niels Buus

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Open dialogue is a resource-oriented approach to mental health, which aims to help those involved in a crisis situation support each other and engage in dialogue. While language use in open dialogue is generally characterized as being open-ended, nondirective, and nonevaluating on the professionals' side, little is known about the specific conversational features. The aim of this study was to analyze the interactional functions of a stance-eliciting question of the form: “Y, what do you think about what X just said?” We used conversation analysis (CA) to examine this in eight video-recorded Danish open dialogue network meetings. In CA, stance involves expressions of attitude, affect, or judgments about people or events. We describe the interactional functions of these stance-eliciting questions and discuss how clinicians used them as a tool for accomplishing neutrality. The findings can be used to gain a more nuanced understanding of open dialogue psychotherapeutic practices.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Marital and Family Therapy
Volume46
Issue4
Pages (from-to)719-731
Number of pages13
ISSN0194-472X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2020

Keywords

  • CIRCULARITY
  • DISCOURSE ANALYSIS
  • NEUTRALITY
  • RESISTANCE
  • THERAPY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '"Y, what do you think about what X just said?” Conversation analysis of stance-eliciting questions in open dialogue network meetings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this