Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Final published version
Mainz and Uhrenfeldt have recently claimed that a violation of the right to privacy can be defined successfully under reliance on the notion of ‘Negative Control’. In this reply, I show that ‘Negative Control’ is unrelated to privacy right violations. It follows that control theorists have yet to put forth a successful normative account of privacy.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Res Publica |
Volume | 27 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages (from-to) | 661-667 |
Number of pages | 7 |
ISSN | 1356-4765 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2021 |
See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats
ID: 221645688