What's in a word?: Why natural isn't objectively better

Lone Koefoed Hansen

doi:10.1145/2541248

What's in a word? Why natural isn't objectively better

Lone Koefoed Hansen

School of Communication and Culture - Digital Design, Langelandsgade

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Comment/debate/letter to the editor › Research

3 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Journal	interactions
Volume	21
Issue	1
Pages (from-to)	22-23
Number of pages	2
ISSN	1072-5520
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1145/2541248
Publication status	Published - Jan 2014

Access to Document

10.1145/2541248

http://interactions.acm.org/archive/view/january-february-2014/whats-in-a-word

Library access?

Check availability with the Royal Danish Library

PIT: Centre for Participatory IT
Halskov, K. (Participant)
01/08/2012 → …
Project: Research

Cite this

@article{2f7d352a374b4ed5840f8cff4c141307,

title = "What's in a word?: Why natural isn't objectively better",

keywords = "natural computing, terminology",

author = "Hansen, \{Lone Koefoed\}",

year = "2014",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1145/2541248",

language = "English",

volume = "21",

pages = "22--23",

journal = "interactions",

issn = "1072-5520",

publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery",

number = "1",

}

What's in a word? Why natural isn't objectively better

Access to Document

Library access?

Projects

PIT: Centre for Participatory IT

Cite this