Abstract
I respond to Scerri’s recent reply to my claim that there was a scientific revolution in chemistry in the early 20th Century. I grant, as Scerri insists, that there are significant continuities through the change about which we are arguing. That is so in all scientific revolutions. But I argue that the changes were such that they constitute a Kuhnian revolution, not in the classic sense of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, but in the sense of Kuhn’s mature theory, developed in the 1980s and early 1990s.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Foundations of Chemistry: Philosophical, Historical, Educational and Interdisciplinary Studies of Chemistry |
Volume | 24 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages (from-to) | 161-170 |
Number of pages | 10 |
ISSN | 1386-4238 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2022 |
Keywords
- atomic number
- chemical elements
- scientific revolution
- Thomas Kuhn
- isotopes
- periodic table of elements
- theory change