Aarhus University Seal / Aarhus Universitets segl

What Do We Learn From Self-Evaluations of Training? A Comparison of Subjective and Objective Evaluations

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

  • Nicolai Kristensen, Denmark
  • http://www.asb.dk/omos/institutter/departmentofeconomics/
  • http://www.asb.dk/forskning/forskningscentreoggrupper/forskningscentre/ccpcenterforcorporateperformance/
  • http://www.asb.dk/forskning/forskningscentreoggrupper/forskningscentre/centreforresearchinintegrationeducationqualificationsandmarg/

Self-evaluations of program impact, notably subjective evaluations of the e¤ects of training, are wide-spread in both the public and the private sector . probably because self-evaluations o¤er an easy and low-cost alternative to rigorous experimental or econometric evaluations. In this paper, I analyze how subjective assessments of satisfaction with training compare to objective measures based on differences in test scores before and after training. I find a complete lack of correspondence between the objective measure of learning and 11 subjective measures of satisfaction with aspects of the courses. This finding suggests that either learning has no weight in the employees. subjective evaluations or subjective evaluations cannot be trusted. At this stage, we cannot fully ascertain whether subjective valuations can be used as a substitute for econometric or experimental program evaluations, but the results found here suggests that this is not the case.

Original languageEnglish
Publication year2007
Number of pages39
Publication statusPublished - 2007
EventSociety of Labor Economists, SOLE Annual Meeting 2007 - Chicago, United States
Duration: 4 May 20075 May 2007
Conference number: 12


ConferenceSociety of Labor Economists, SOLE Annual Meeting 2007
CountryUnited States

    Research areas

  • Training, Program Evaluation, Self-Evaluation

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 30690