Aarhus University Seal

Dansk

You are here: » What constitutes expertise in research ethics and integrity?

About Aarhus University

What constitutes expertise in research ethics and integrity?

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

What constitutes expertise in research ethics and integrity? / Braun , Robert ; Ravn, Tine; Frankus, Elisabeth.
In: Research Ethics, Vol. 16, No. 1-2, 01.2020, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Braun , R, Ravn, T & Frankus, E 2020, 'What constitutes expertise in research ethics and integrity?', Research Ethics, vol. 16, no. 1-2, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119898402

APA

Braun , R., Ravn, T., & Frankus, E. (2020). What constitutes expertise in research ethics and integrity? Research Ethics, 16(1-2), 1-16. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119898402

CBE

Braun R, Ravn T, Frankus E. 2020. What constitutes expertise in research ethics and integrity?. Research Ethics. 16(1-2):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119898402

MLA

Braun , Robert , Tine Ravn and Elisabeth Frankus. "What constitutes expertise in research ethics and integrity?". Research Ethics. 2020, 16(1-2). 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119898402

Vancouver

Braun R, Ravn T, Frankus E. What constitutes expertise in research ethics and integrity? Research Ethics. 2020 Jan;16(1-2):1-16. Epub 2020. doi: 10.1177/1747016119898402

Author

Braun , Robert ; Ravn, Tine ; Frankus, Elisabeth. / What constitutes expertise in research ethics and integrity?. In: Research Ethics. 2020 ; Vol. 16, No. 1-2. pp. 1-16.

Bibtex

@article{4b76265beacc4b5ab41e397fdb7aa09e,
title = "What constitutes expertise in research ethics and integrity?",
abstract = "In this paper we reflect on the looming question of what constitutes expertise in ethics. Based on an empirical program that involved qualitative and quantitative as well as participatory research elements we show that expertise in research ethics and integrity is based on experience in the assessment processes. We then connect traditional concepts of expertise as “improved performance” with deliberate practice activities and, based on our research findings, show that ethical assessment experience is a form of deliberate practice. This in our view has further ramifications in the design and recruitment processes of ethical assessment units performing research ethics and integrity assessment.",
keywords = "Research ethics and integrity, consensus conference, deliberate practice, experience, expertise",
author = "Robert Braun and Tine Ravn and Elisabeth Frankus",
year = "2020",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1177/1747016119898402",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "Research Ethics",
issn = "1747-0161",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1-2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - What constitutes expertise in research ethics and integrity?

AU - Braun , Robert

AU - Ravn, Tine

AU - Frankus, Elisabeth

PY - 2020/1

Y1 - 2020/1

N2 - In this paper we reflect on the looming question of what constitutes expertise in ethics. Based on an empirical program that involved qualitative and quantitative as well as participatory research elements we show that expertise in research ethics and integrity is based on experience in the assessment processes. We then connect traditional concepts of expertise as “improved performance” with deliberate practice activities and, based on our research findings, show that ethical assessment experience is a form of deliberate practice. This in our view has further ramifications in the design and recruitment processes of ethical assessment units performing research ethics and integrity assessment.

AB - In this paper we reflect on the looming question of what constitutes expertise in ethics. Based on an empirical program that involved qualitative and quantitative as well as participatory research elements we show that expertise in research ethics and integrity is based on experience in the assessment processes. We then connect traditional concepts of expertise as “improved performance” with deliberate practice activities and, based on our research findings, show that ethical assessment experience is a form of deliberate practice. This in our view has further ramifications in the design and recruitment processes of ethical assessment units performing research ethics and integrity assessment.

KW - Research ethics and integrity

KW - consensus conference

KW - deliberate practice

KW - experience

KW - expertise

U2 - 10.1177/1747016119898402

DO - 10.1177/1747016119898402

M3 - Journal article

VL - 16

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - Research Ethics

JF - Research Ethics

SN - 1747-0161

IS - 1-2

ER -