Was something rotten in the state of Denmark? Three narratives of the active internationalism in Danish foreign policy

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
260 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Danish decision to enter US-led coalitions in Afghanistan and Iraq significantly consolidated and strengthened the Atlantic dimension in Danish foreign policy in the period 2001–2009. The period has attracted considerable academic interest, but there seems to be a lack of consensus about how to interpret the Danish decision, which has been characterised as everything from an indication of adaptation, to continuation of the Danish acquiescence to great powers, to path-breaking change in Danish foreign policy to an expression of small state independence. Part of the confusion in the literature is due to the lack of clear conceptual awareness regarding the concepts in use. This article identifies three frames in the literature and contributes to our understanding of the question of change and continuity in small state foreign and security policy by identifying the analytical implications of adopting a clearer understanding of analytical concepts such as adaptation, determinism, activism and internationalism in the Scandinavian context in general and the Danish context more specifically.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCooperation and Conflict
Volume53
Issue4
Pages (from-to)449-466
Number of pages18
ISSN0010-8367
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2018

Keywords

  • Activism
  • Denmark
  • adaptation
  • determinism
  • foreign policy
  • internationalism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Was something rotten in the state of Denmark? Three narratives of the active internationalism in Danish foreign policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this