Using the waiting time distribution with random index dates to estimate prescription durations in the presence of seasonal stockpiling

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review


  • Katrine Bødkergaard
  • Randi M Selmer, Norwegian Institute of Public Health
  • ,
  • Jesper Hallas, Univ Southern Denmark, University of Southern Denmark
  • ,
  • Lars J Kjerpeseth, Norwegian Institute of Public Health
  • ,
  • Anton Pottegård, Univ Southern Denmark, University of Southern Denmark
  • ,
  • Eva Skovlund, Norwegian Institute of Public Health
  • ,
  • Henrik Støvring

PURPOSE: A pervasive problem in registry-based pharmacoepidemiological studies is what exposure duration to assign to individual prescriptions. The parametric waiting time distribution (WTD) has been proposed as a method to estimate such durations. However, when prescription durations vary due to seasonal stockpiling, WTD estimates will vary with choice of index date. To counter this, we propose using random index dates.

METHODS: Within a calendar period of a given length, δ, we randomly sample individual index dates. We include the last prescription redemption prior to the index date in the analysis. Only redemptions within distance δ of the index date are included. In a simulation study with varying types and degrees of stockpiling at the end of the year, we investigated bias and precision of the reverse WTD with fixed and random index dates, respectively. In addition, we applied the new method to estimate durations of Norwegian warfarin prescriptions in 2014.

RESULTS: In simulation settings with stockpiling, the reverse WTD with random index dates had low relative biases (-0.65% to 6.64%) and high coverage probabilities (92.0% to 95.3%), although when stockpiling was pronounced, coverage probabilities decreased (2.7% to 85.8%). Using a fixed index date was inferior. The estimated duration of warfarin prescriptions in Norway using random index dates was 131 (130; 132) days.

CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of seasonal stockpiling, the WTD with random index dates provides estimates of prescription durations, which are more stable, less biased and with better coverage when compared to using a fixed index date.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Pages (from-to)1072-1078
Number of pages7
Publication statusPublished - 2020

    Research areas

  • DRUG-USE, maximum likelihood, parametric modelling, pharmacoepidemiology, prescription duration, seasonal variation, waiting time distribution

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 188899767