The Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy

Using mixed methods to map vaguely defined research areas

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

The aim of this article is to present an alternative method for science mapping, which remedies some of the classic limitations to e.g. using co-citation analysis as a mapping tool. With the emergence of new, more complex and interdisciplinary areas of research it becomes important to adjust our understandings of how to study these areas, and the argument of the present paper is that in order to provide high-resolution maps of emerging scientific areas, we need to start in the 'cognitive colleges' of the research areas themselves. To do so, a mixed methods design with co-nomination as its backbone is proposed. The potential and limitations of the alternative approach to science mapping are discussed based on an empirical example of mapping an vaguely defined research area in Denmark.

Original languageEnglish
JournalResearch Evaluation
Volume28
Issue4
Pages (from-to)394-404
Number of pages11
ISSN0958-2029
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2019

    Research areas

  • CO-NOMINATION, MAPPING SCIENTIFIC FIELDS, co-nomination, complex research areas, mixed methods, science mapping

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 168077014