Use of Singing for Lung Health as an alternative training modality within pulmonary rehabilitation for COPD: a randomised controlled trial

Mette Kaasgaard, Daniel Bech Rasmussen, Karen Hjerrild Andreasson, Ole Hilberg, Anders Løkke, Peter Vuust, Uffe Bodtger

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)
43 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a cornerstone in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management. However, PR adherence is generally low, and barriers include availability, economic issues, motivation and an inability to attend or perform physical training. Therefore, alternative, evidence-based PR activities are required. Singing may have benefits for quality of life (QoL), respiratory control and well-being in COPD, but the impact on the PR key outcome, physical exercise capacity, is uncertain.

METHODS: In this randomised controlled trial (NCT03280355), we investigated the effectiveness of 10 weeks of PR, including either "Singing for Lung Health" (SLH) training or standard physical exercise training (PExT). The primary outcome was a change in exercise capacity (6-min walk distance (6MWD)) from baseline to post-PR. Secondary outcomes were changes in QoL (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS), lung function, dyspnoea and adherence.

RESULTS: We included 270 COPD patients, and 195 completed the study. Demographics across groups were comparable, and both groups improved significantly in 6MWD and SGRQ score. SLH was non-inferior to PExT in improving 6MWD (mean±sd 13.1±36.3 m versus 14.1±32.3 m, p=0.81; difference 1.0 m, 95% CI -7.3-9.3 m) with 21.8% and 25.0%, respectively (p=0.57), reaching the 6MWD minimal important difference of 30 m. We found no significant between-group differences concerning SGRQ, HADS, lung function, dyspnoea or adherence.

CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that SLH is non-inferior to PExT in improving 6MWD during a 10-week PR programme. Future studies addressing reproducibility, long-term effects and health economics are needed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2101142
JournalEuropean Respiratory Journal
Volume59
Issue5
Number of pages12
ISSN0903-1936
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2022

Keywords

  • Dyspnea/rehabilitation
  • Exercise Tolerance
  • Humans
  • Lung
  • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/rehabilitation
  • Quality of Life
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Singing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Use of Singing for Lung Health as an alternative training modality within pulmonary rehabilitation for COPD: a randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this