Thou Shalt Not! – How the institutional afterlife of research misconduct scandals shapes research integrity training

Serge Pascal Johannes M Horbach, Rachel Fishberg, Sven Arend Ulpts, Lise Degn

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Scandals involving cases of research misconduct are often considered to be main drivers for policy initiatives and institutional changes to foster research integrity. These impacts of scandals are usually witnessed during scandals’ peak visibility. In this article we change this perspective by examining the way in which scandals continue impacting academic institutions long after the initial attention has faded. To do so, we empirically study research integrity courses at multiple Danish universities. We combine data from document analysis, participatory observations and interviews. In addition, this article makes a conceptual contribution by introducing the notion of the ‘institutional afterlife’ of a scandal. We use this notion to demonstrate how scandals can affect academic communities and practices long after their initial visibility has faded, by re-entering communities and institutions. We thereby contribute a novel approach to studying scandals and their wider implications in academia.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2414500
JournalJournal of Responsible Innovation
Volume11
Issue1
Number of pages21
ISSN2329-9460
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • PhD training
  • institutional responses
  • research integrity
  • research misconduct scandals
  • responsible conduct of research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Thou Shalt Not! – How the institutional afterlife of research misconduct scandals shapes research integrity training'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this