Aarhus University Seal / Aarhus Universitets segl

The Role of Testimony in Mathematics

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Line Edslev Andersen
  • ,
  • Hanne Andersen, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Henrik Kragh Sørensen, University of Copenhagen

Mathematicians appear to have quite high standards for when they will rely on testimony. Many mathematicians require that a number of experts testify that they have checked the proof of a result p before they will rely on p in their own proofs without checking the proof of p. We examine why this is. We argue that for each expert who testifies that she has checked the proof of p and found no errors, the likelihood that the proof contains no substantial errors increases because different experts will validate the proof in different ways depending on their background knowledge and individual preferences. If this is correct, there is much to be gained for a mathematician from requiring that a number of experts have checked the proof of p before she will rely on p in her own proofs without checking the proof of p. In this way a mathematician can protect her own work and the work of others from errors. Our argument thus provides an explanation for mathematicians’ attitude towards relying on testimony.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)859-870
Number of pages12
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021
EventVirtue Epistemology of Mathematical Practice - Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
Duration: 13 Jul 201814 Jul 2018


WorkshopVirtue Epistemology of Mathematical Practice
LocationVrije Universiteit Brussel

    Research areas

  • Epistemic dependence, Mathematical practice, Mathematics, Testimony

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 189192987