You are here:
» The Relevance of Evidence from the History of Science in ...
About Aarhus University
The Relevance of Evidence from the History of Science in the Contemporary Realism/Anti-realism Debate
Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Documents
- document
Final published version, 300 KB, PDF document
DOI
- https://doi.org/10.4245/sponge.v9i1.26986
Final published version
I aim to clarify the relevance of evidence from the history of science to
the contemporary realism/anti-realism debate as the need for evidence from
the history of science is often misunderstood or misrepresented.
the contemporary realism/anti-realism debate as the need for evidence from
the history of science is often misunderstood or misrepresented.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 143-145 |
| ISSN | 1913-0465 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
- realism, anti-realism, evidence from history, history of science
Research areas
See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats
Download statistics
No data available
ID: 121616946