The Philae Controversy – Muscular Modernization and Paternalistic Preservation in Aswan and London

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The Philae Controversy – Muscular Modernization and Paternalistic Preservation in Aswan and London. / Andersen, Casper.

In: History and Anthropology, Vol. 22, No. 2, 05.2011, p. 203-220.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{2d0c3a603b0e4df4953cb773ca3fbc39,
title = "The Philae Controversy – Muscular Modernization and Paternalistic Preservation in Aswan and London",
abstract = "In 1882, the British occupied Egypt. A decade later British Egyptologists successfully spearheaded an international campaign against a scheme to dam the Nile at Aswan—a project that would result in the flooding of the Island and Temples of Philae. The article analyses the campaign to preserve Philae as it unfolded at the Foreign Office in Downing Street, in Egyptologists circles in Britain, among British administrators in Cairo, and in public spheres in late-Victorian London. Introducing the terms muscular modernization and paternalistic preservation the article analyses the tensions that the Philae controversy revealed in British imperial ideologies in relation to questions of modernity and tradition. Drawing on a uniquely well-preserved archival record the article demonstrates how the protection of what we now call global heritage was negotiated before the birth of UNESCO. ",
author = "Casper Andersen",
year = "2011",
month = may,
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "203--220",
journal = "History and Anthropology",
issn = "0275-7206",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Philae Controversy – Muscular Modernization and Paternalistic Preservation in Aswan and London

AU - Andersen, Casper

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - In 1882, the British occupied Egypt. A decade later British Egyptologists successfully spearheaded an international campaign against a scheme to dam the Nile at Aswan—a project that would result in the flooding of the Island and Temples of Philae. The article analyses the campaign to preserve Philae as it unfolded at the Foreign Office in Downing Street, in Egyptologists circles in Britain, among British administrators in Cairo, and in public spheres in late-Victorian London. Introducing the terms muscular modernization and paternalistic preservation the article analyses the tensions that the Philae controversy revealed in British imperial ideologies in relation to questions of modernity and tradition. Drawing on a uniquely well-preserved archival record the article demonstrates how the protection of what we now call global heritage was negotiated before the birth of UNESCO.

AB - In 1882, the British occupied Egypt. A decade later British Egyptologists successfully spearheaded an international campaign against a scheme to dam the Nile at Aswan—a project that would result in the flooding of the Island and Temples of Philae. The article analyses the campaign to preserve Philae as it unfolded at the Foreign Office in Downing Street, in Egyptologists circles in Britain, among British administrators in Cairo, and in public spheres in late-Victorian London. Introducing the terms muscular modernization and paternalistic preservation the article analyses the tensions that the Philae controversy revealed in British imperial ideologies in relation to questions of modernity and tradition. Drawing on a uniquely well-preserved archival record the article demonstrates how the protection of what we now call global heritage was negotiated before the birth of UNESCO.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 22

SP - 203

EP - 220

JO - History and Anthropology

JF - History and Anthropology

SN - 0275-7206

IS - 2

ER -