The perception and use of generative AI for science-related information search: Insights from a cross-national study

Esther Greussing*, Lars Guenther, Ayelet Baram-Tsabari, Shakked Dabran-Zivan, Evelyn Jonas, Inbal Klein-Avraham, Monika Taddicken, Torben Esbo Agergaard, Becca Beets, Dominique Brossard, Anwesha Chakraborty, Antoinette Fage-Butler, Chun Ju Huang, Siddharth Kankaria, Yin-Yueh Lo, Kristian Hvidtfelt Nielsen, Michelle Riedlinger, Hyunjin Song

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Publicly accessible large language models like ChatGPT are emerging as novel information intermediaries, enabling easy access to a wide range of science-related information. This study presents survey data from seven countries (N = 4320) obtained in July and August 2023, focusing on the perception and use of GenAI for science-related information search. Despite the novelty of ChatGPT, a sizable proportion of respondents already reported using it to access science-related information. In addition, the study explores how these users perceive ChatGPT compared with traditional types of information intermediaries (e.g. Google Search), their knowledge of, and trust in GenAI, compared with nonusers as well as compared with those who use ChatGPT for other purposes. Overall, this study provides insights into the perception and use of GenAI at an early stage of adoption, advancing our understanding of how this emerging technology shapes public understanding of science issues as an information intermediary.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPublic Understanding of Science
ISSN0963-6625
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub / Early view - 31 Jan 2025

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence
  • cross-national research
  • information search
  • survey

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The perception and use of generative AI for science-related information search: Insights from a cross-national study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this