The Past in the Present-The Role of Analogical Reasoning in Epistemic Learning About How to Tackle Complex Policy Problems

Derek Beach, David Schäfer, Sandrino Smeets

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)
203 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article unpacks the role that analogical reasoning plays in epistemic learning, helping actors identify and evaluate what solutions can be used to fix complex, high‐stakes policy problems. Based on recent research in cognitive psychology, we develop a two‐stage analogical reasoning model of learning in which core causal lessons are transferred to the current target case, but where contextual differences are also discounted. The result is the restriction of the set of solutions considered in a policy debate to those that have positive source cases associated with them, and no compelling negative source cases. In the Banking Union case study assessed in this article, we provide evidence that analogical reasoning did play an important role in setting the parameters of the debates. The article concludes with a call for policy analysts to pay more attention to how comparisons with the past structure policy debates.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPolicy Studies Journal
Volume49
Issue2
Pages (from-to)457-483
Number of pages27
ISSN0190-292X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2021

Keywords

  • AMBIGUITY
  • COMMUNITIES
  • CRISIS
  • DIMENSIONS
  • EXPERIENCE
  • EXTRAPOLATION
  • HISTORICAL ANALOGIES
  • KNOWLEDGE
  • LESSONS
  • WICKED PROBLEMS
  • analogical reasoning
  • epistemic learning
  • policy learning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Past in the Present-The Role of Analogical Reasoning in Epistemic Learning About How to Tackle Complex Policy Problems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this