The Orwellian Dimension of Scientific Progress: from Part III - Incommensurability, Progress, and Revolutions

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Kuhn claims after a revolutionary change of theory, scientists need to write new textbooks to incorporate the new theoretical perspective. The revisions do not merely involve the addition of the new discoveries. The task involves some rewriting of the history of the discipline. Kuhn suggests there are parallels to Orwell’s 1984. The “new” history of a scientific field is written to emphasize the continuity through the change. I examine the role Kuhn’s comparison to 1984 plays in his argument, and the significance of the rewriting of a discipline’s history after a change of theory. The process tells us something about both how scientists are trained to work effectively, and the nature of the changes that occur during a scientific revolution.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationKuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions at 60
EditorsK. Brad Wray
Place of publicationCambridge
PublisherCambridge University Press
Publication dateJan 2024
Pages182-196
Chapter10
ISBN (Print)9781009100700
ISBN (Electronic)9781009122696
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2024
SeriesCambridge Philosophical Anniversaries

Keywords

  • scientific progress
  • theory change
  • George Orwell
  • science textbooks
  • history of science
  • scientific training

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Orwellian Dimension of Scientific Progress: from Part III - Incommensurability, Progress, and Revolutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this