Projects per year
Abstract
Kuhn claims after a revolutionary change of theory, scientists need to write new textbooks to incorporate the new theoretical perspective. The revisions do not merely involve the addition of the new discoveries. The task involves some rewriting of the history of the discipline. Kuhn suggests there are parallels to Orwell’s 1984. The “new” history of a scientific field is written to emphasize the continuity through the change. I examine the role Kuhn’s comparison to 1984 plays in his argument, and the significance of the rewriting of a discipline’s history after a change of theory. The process tells us something about both how scientists are trained to work effectively, and the nature of the changes that occur during a scientific revolution.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions at 60 |
Editors | K. Brad Wray |
Place of publication | Cambridge |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Publication date | Jan 2024 |
Pages | 182-196 |
Chapter | 10 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781009100700 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781009122696 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2024 |
Series | Cambridge Philosophical Anniversaries |
---|
Keywords
- scientific progress
- theory change
- George Orwell
- science textbooks
- history of science
- scientific training
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Orwellian Dimension of Scientific Progress: from Part III - Incommensurability, Progress, and Revolutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Active
-
Thomas Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions: Its Writing and Impact
Wray, K. B. (PI)
01/09/2020 → …
Project: Research