Department of Political Science

The lobbying success of citizen and economic groups in Denmark and the UK

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The lobbying success of citizen and economic groups in Denmark and the UK. / Binderkrantz, Anne Skorkjær; Pedersen, Helene Helboe.

In: Acta Politica, Vol. 54, No. 1, 01.2019, p. 75-103.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Binderkrantz AS, Pedersen HH. The lobbying success of citizen and economic groups in Denmark and the UK. Acta Politica. 2019 Jan;54(1):75-103. Epub 2018. doi: 10.1057/s41269-017-0076-7

Author

Bibtex

@article{61238962e5c14c7d83234e8206799359,
title = "The lobbying success of citizen and economic groups in Denmark and the UK",
abstract = "The political influence of interest groups manifests in different ways. Interest groups may affect which political problems attract attention as well as the political decisions aimed at solving these problems. Crucially, different types of groups may be successful in respect to these different dimensions of influence. Economic groups have been described as engaging more in “insider” politics affecting public policy decisions, whereas citizen groups engage more in “outsider” politics affecting agenda setting. This study investigates the multidimensional character of interest group influence and links it to group type as well as lobbying strategies. The study is based on original survey data collected among Danish and British interest groups in 2011–2014. We find two related but distinct dimensions associated with agenda-setting and decision-making lobbying success. The analyses show that citizen and economic groups influence politics in different ways due to their choice of strategies and their different types of resources. Thus, group type has a direct as well as an indirect effect on lobbying success. This relationship is present in both pluralist UK and corporatist Denmark.",
keywords = "Denmark, Interest groups, Lobbying strategies, Lobbying success, United Kingdom, CORPORATISM, INTEREST GROUP STRATEGIES, MOBILIZATION, COVERAGE, EUROPEAN-UNION, CONTEXT, EU, ACCESS",
author = "Binderkrantz, {Anne Skorkj{\ae}r} and Pedersen, {Helene Helboe}",
year = "2019",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1057/s41269-017-0076-7",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "75--103",
journal = "Acta Politica",
issn = "0001-6810",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The lobbying success of citizen and economic groups in Denmark and the UK

AU - Binderkrantz, Anne Skorkjær

AU - Pedersen, Helene Helboe

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - The political influence of interest groups manifests in different ways. Interest groups may affect which political problems attract attention as well as the political decisions aimed at solving these problems. Crucially, different types of groups may be successful in respect to these different dimensions of influence. Economic groups have been described as engaging more in “insider” politics affecting public policy decisions, whereas citizen groups engage more in “outsider” politics affecting agenda setting. This study investigates the multidimensional character of interest group influence and links it to group type as well as lobbying strategies. The study is based on original survey data collected among Danish and British interest groups in 2011–2014. We find two related but distinct dimensions associated with agenda-setting and decision-making lobbying success. The analyses show that citizen and economic groups influence politics in different ways due to their choice of strategies and their different types of resources. Thus, group type has a direct as well as an indirect effect on lobbying success. This relationship is present in both pluralist UK and corporatist Denmark.

AB - The political influence of interest groups manifests in different ways. Interest groups may affect which political problems attract attention as well as the political decisions aimed at solving these problems. Crucially, different types of groups may be successful in respect to these different dimensions of influence. Economic groups have been described as engaging more in “insider” politics affecting public policy decisions, whereas citizen groups engage more in “outsider” politics affecting agenda setting. This study investigates the multidimensional character of interest group influence and links it to group type as well as lobbying strategies. The study is based on original survey data collected among Danish and British interest groups in 2011–2014. We find two related but distinct dimensions associated with agenda-setting and decision-making lobbying success. The analyses show that citizen and economic groups influence politics in different ways due to their choice of strategies and their different types of resources. Thus, group type has a direct as well as an indirect effect on lobbying success. This relationship is present in both pluralist UK and corporatist Denmark.

KW - Denmark

KW - Interest groups

KW - Lobbying strategies

KW - Lobbying success

KW - United Kingdom

KW - CORPORATISM

KW - INTEREST GROUP STRATEGIES

KW - MOBILIZATION

KW - COVERAGE

KW - EUROPEAN-UNION

KW - CONTEXT

KW - EU

KW - ACCESS

U2 - 10.1057/s41269-017-0076-7

DO - 10.1057/s41269-017-0076-7

M3 - Journal article

VL - 54

SP - 75

EP - 103

JO - Acta Politica

JF - Acta Politica

SN - 0001-6810

IS - 1

ER -