The Gendering of Objectivity in Science: An Interview with Anne Fausto-Sterling and Julie Nelson

Lea Skewes, Mads Ananda Lodahl

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleCommunication

Abstract

What is the difference between having an opinionon gender and having knowledge about gender? Can both laypeople and scientists tell opinion and knowledge apart? Can we successfully separate science from cultural assumptions about gender? These were some of the questions we invited Anne Fausto-Sterling (who is a Professor Emerita of Biology at Brown University) and Julie Nelson (who is a Professor of Economics at University of Massachusetts Boston) to discuss at the Wo-men’s Museum in Aarhus in March 2015. We cho-se these two professors because they are both famous feminist icons who have chosen to raise important discussions about gendering in science within their disciplines of biology and economics, respectively.1Some of the highlights from our discussion center on how the discipline of science and the concept of objectivity have been fundamentally gendered from the beginning, with white Euro-pean men being understood as the ideal scientists, while women and people of color have been disqualifi ed from legitimate knowledge producti-on simply because of their gender or skin color.
Original languageEnglish
JournalKvinder, Køn & Forskning
Volume31
Issue2
Pages (from-to)74-84
Number of pages11
ISSN0907-6182
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2021

Keywords

  • Objectivity
  • Science
  • Gender Stereotypes
  • Backlash
  • FEMINISM

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Gendering of Objectivity in Science: An Interview with Anne Fausto-Sterling and Julie Nelson'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this