Aarhus University Seal

The effect of past defaunation on ranges, niches, and future biodiversity forecasts

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The effect of past defaunation on ranges, niches, and future biodiversity forecasts. / Sales, Lilian P.; Galetti, Mauro; Carnaval, Ana et al.
In: Global change biology, Vol. 28, No. 11, 06.2022, p. 3683-3693.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Sales, LP, Galetti, M, Carnaval, A, Monsarrat, S, Svenning, JC & Pires, MM 2022, 'The effect of past defaunation on ranges, niches, and future biodiversity forecasts', Global change biology, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 3683-3693. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16145

APA

Sales, L. P., Galetti, M., Carnaval, A., Monsarrat, S., Svenning, J. C., & Pires, M. M. (2022). The effect of past defaunation on ranges, niches, and future biodiversity forecasts. Global change biology, 28(11), 3683-3693. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16145

CBE

Sales LP, Galetti M, Carnaval A, Monsarrat S, Svenning JC, Pires MM. 2022. The effect of past defaunation on ranges, niches, and future biodiversity forecasts. Global change biology. 28(11):3683-3693. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16145

MLA

Vancouver

Sales LP, Galetti M, Carnaval A, Monsarrat S, Svenning JC, Pires MM. The effect of past defaunation on ranges, niches, and future biodiversity forecasts. Global change biology. 2022 Jun;28(11):3683-3693. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16145

Author

Sales, Lilian P. ; Galetti, Mauro ; Carnaval, Ana et al. / The effect of past defaunation on ranges, niches, and future biodiversity forecasts. In: Global change biology. 2022 ; Vol. 28, No. 11. pp. 3683-3693.

Bibtex

@article{07b14fd745ce489a9b41a05d318778bd,
title = "The effect of past defaunation on ranges, niches, and future biodiversity forecasts",
abstract = "Humans have reshaped the distribution of biodiversity across the globe, extirpating species from regions otherwise suitable and restricting populations to a subset of their original ranges. Here, we ask if anthropogenic range contractions since the Late Pleistocene led to an under-representation of the realized niches for megafauna, an emblematic group of taxa often targeted for restoration actions. Using reconstructions of past geographic distributions (i.e., natural ranges) for 146 extant terrestrial large-bodied (>44 kg) mammals, we estimate their climatic niches as if they had retained their original distributions and evaluate their observed niche dynamics. We found that range contractions led to a sizeable under-representation of the realized niches of several species (i.e., niche unfilling). For 29 species, more than 10% of the environmental space once seen in their natural ranges has been lost due to anthropogenic activity, with at least 12 species undergoing reductions of more than 50% of their realized niches. Eighteen species may now be confined to low-suitability locations, where fitness and abundance are likely diminished; we consider these taxa 'climatic refugees'. For those species, conservation strategies supported by current ranges risk being misguided if current, suboptimal habitats are considered baseline for future restoration actions. Because most climate-based biodiversity forecasts rely exclusively on current occurrence records, we went on to test the effect of neglecting historical information on estimates of species{\textquoteright} potential distribution – as a proxy of sensitivity to climate change. We found that niche unfilling driven by past range contraction leads to an overestimation of sensitivity to future climatic change, resulting in 50% higher rates of global extinction, and underestimating the potential for megafauna conservation and restoration under future climate change. In conclusion, range contractions since the Late Pleistocene have also left imprints on megafauna realized climatic niches. Therefore, niche truncation driven by defaunation can directly affect climate and habitat-based conservation strategies.",
keywords = "biodiversity conservation, defaunation, ecological niche models, refugee species, shifting baselines",
author = "Sales, {Lilian P.} and Mauro Galetti and Ana Carnaval and Sophie Monsarrat and Svenning, {Jens Christian} and Pires, {Mathias M.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2022",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1111/gcb.16145",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "3683--3693",
journal = "Global change biology",
issn = "1354-1013",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of past defaunation on ranges, niches, and future biodiversity forecasts

AU - Sales, Lilian P.

AU - Galetti, Mauro

AU - Carnaval, Ana

AU - Monsarrat, Sophie

AU - Svenning, Jens Christian

AU - Pires, Mathias M.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2022/6

Y1 - 2022/6

N2 - Humans have reshaped the distribution of biodiversity across the globe, extirpating species from regions otherwise suitable and restricting populations to a subset of their original ranges. Here, we ask if anthropogenic range contractions since the Late Pleistocene led to an under-representation of the realized niches for megafauna, an emblematic group of taxa often targeted for restoration actions. Using reconstructions of past geographic distributions (i.e., natural ranges) for 146 extant terrestrial large-bodied (>44 kg) mammals, we estimate their climatic niches as if they had retained their original distributions and evaluate their observed niche dynamics. We found that range contractions led to a sizeable under-representation of the realized niches of several species (i.e., niche unfilling). For 29 species, more than 10% of the environmental space once seen in their natural ranges has been lost due to anthropogenic activity, with at least 12 species undergoing reductions of more than 50% of their realized niches. Eighteen species may now be confined to low-suitability locations, where fitness and abundance are likely diminished; we consider these taxa 'climatic refugees'. For those species, conservation strategies supported by current ranges risk being misguided if current, suboptimal habitats are considered baseline for future restoration actions. Because most climate-based biodiversity forecasts rely exclusively on current occurrence records, we went on to test the effect of neglecting historical information on estimates of species’ potential distribution – as a proxy of sensitivity to climate change. We found that niche unfilling driven by past range contraction leads to an overestimation of sensitivity to future climatic change, resulting in 50% higher rates of global extinction, and underestimating the potential for megafauna conservation and restoration under future climate change. In conclusion, range contractions since the Late Pleistocene have also left imprints on megafauna realized climatic niches. Therefore, niche truncation driven by defaunation can directly affect climate and habitat-based conservation strategies.

AB - Humans have reshaped the distribution of biodiversity across the globe, extirpating species from regions otherwise suitable and restricting populations to a subset of their original ranges. Here, we ask if anthropogenic range contractions since the Late Pleistocene led to an under-representation of the realized niches for megafauna, an emblematic group of taxa often targeted for restoration actions. Using reconstructions of past geographic distributions (i.e., natural ranges) for 146 extant terrestrial large-bodied (>44 kg) mammals, we estimate their climatic niches as if they had retained their original distributions and evaluate their observed niche dynamics. We found that range contractions led to a sizeable under-representation of the realized niches of several species (i.e., niche unfilling). For 29 species, more than 10% of the environmental space once seen in their natural ranges has been lost due to anthropogenic activity, with at least 12 species undergoing reductions of more than 50% of their realized niches. Eighteen species may now be confined to low-suitability locations, where fitness and abundance are likely diminished; we consider these taxa 'climatic refugees'. For those species, conservation strategies supported by current ranges risk being misguided if current, suboptimal habitats are considered baseline for future restoration actions. Because most climate-based biodiversity forecasts rely exclusively on current occurrence records, we went on to test the effect of neglecting historical information on estimates of species’ potential distribution – as a proxy of sensitivity to climate change. We found that niche unfilling driven by past range contraction leads to an overestimation of sensitivity to future climatic change, resulting in 50% higher rates of global extinction, and underestimating the potential for megafauna conservation and restoration under future climate change. In conclusion, range contractions since the Late Pleistocene have also left imprints on megafauna realized climatic niches. Therefore, niche truncation driven by defaunation can directly affect climate and habitat-based conservation strategies.

KW - biodiversity conservation

KW - defaunation

KW - ecological niche models

KW - refugee species

KW - shifting baselines

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127213508&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/gcb.16145

DO - 10.1111/gcb.16145

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35246902

AN - SCOPUS:85127213508

VL - 28

SP - 3683

EP - 3693

JO - Global change biology

JF - Global change biology

SN - 1354-1013

IS - 11

ER -