Department of Political Science

The costs of no – a two-dimensional issue-voting model of voter behavior in EU referendums

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearch

  • Department of Political Science
What determines voter choice in EU referendums? Do voters treat referendums as ‘second order elections’ due to the complexity of the question posed to them; turning them in effect to a referendum on whether the voter trusts the government to represent his/her best interests, where the standard of evaluation is voter satisfaction with the economic and political performance of the incumbent government (Franklin, Marsh, and Wlezien 1994; Franklin 2002). Or do voters undertake a utility calculation of the costs and benefits of the issue before them (whether the country should ratify an EU treaty) (Svensson 1994, 2002)? The argument in this paper is that issue-voting is increasingly becoming the prevalent dynamic in EU referendums as voters become increasingly knowledgeable about EU affairs and believe that referendums are important questions worthy of the investment of significant time and effort in understanding the issues. However, in contrast to existing issue-voting arguments, I argue that the calculation of the utility of voting yes/no by voters has two distinct dimensions. Existing models are based upon the idea that voters undertake a utility calculation of the benefits of ratifying an EU treaty (or removing an opt-out), but this does not capture the separate reasoning of voters regarding what happens in the event that the country votes no.
Original languageEnglish
Publication year2009
Number of pages30
Publication statusPublished - 2009
EventEuropean Union Studies Association Biennual Conference - Los Angeles, United States
Duration: 23 Apr 200925 Apr 2009

Conference

ConferenceEuropean Union Studies Association Biennual Conference
CountryUnited States
CityLos Angeles
Period23/04/200925/04/2009

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 17399260