The challenges of evaluating and comparing projects: An empirical study of designing a comparison framework

Per Svejvig, Flemming Hedegaard

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Project Half Double is an industry-driven initiative with the purpose to develop a new and radical project paradigm to increase the competitiveness of the Danish industry. The research part of Project Half Double will assess the degree to which the new project paradigm is more successful than traditional approaches, which calls for an evaluation and comparison framework. This paper describes the design of such a comparison framework consisting of the five elements context, project, mechanism/practices, output and impact based on the open systems view. We illustrate the use of the comparison framework for front-loading projects in Grundfos and the specific evaluation criteria used here. The design and use of comparison frameworks have some implications such as it being challenging to define relevant and meaningful evaluation criteria, it is difficult to collect complex evaluation data, and some organizations lack the project maturity to take advantage of the frameworks.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProject Management for Achieving Change
EditorsJan Pries-Heje, Per Svejvig
Number of pages23
PublisherRoskilde Universitetsforlag
Publication date2016
Pages107-129
Chapter5
ISBN (Print)9788778674845
ISBN (Electronic)9788778674944
Publication statusPublished - 2016
EventSecond Danish Project Management Research Conference - Copenhagen, Denmark
Duration: 8 Jun 20169 Jun 2016
Conference number: 2

Conference

ConferenceSecond Danish Project Management Research Conference
Number2
Country/TerritoryDenmark
CityCopenhagen
Period08/06/201609/06/2016

Cite this