The challenge in estimating soil compressive strength for use in risk assessment of soil compaction in field traffic

Per Schjønning*, Mathieu Lamandé, Jan De Pue, Wim M. Cornelis, Rodrigo Labouriau, Thomas Keller

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Society calls for protection of agricultural soils in order to sustain the production of foods for a growing population. Compaction of subsoil layers is an increasing problem in modern agriculture and a cause of serious concern because of the poor resilience in natural amelioration. The concept of soil precompression stress has been adapted from civil engineering, although in soil science it is applied to unsaturated soils that have developed a secondary structure from the action of weather, biota and tillage. It assumes strain is elastic at loads up to the precompression stress, while plastic deformation is expected at higher stresses. To determine this threshold we performed uniaxial, confined compression tests for a total of 584 minimally disturbed soil cores sampled at three subsoil layers on nine Danish soils ranging in clay content from 0.02 to 0.38 kg kg−1. The cores were drained to either of three matric potentials (−50, −100 or − 300 hPa) prior to loading. Stress was applied by a constant-strain rate method. We estimated the point of maximum curvature of the strain-log10(normal stress) relation by a numerical procedure. This point is considered here as a compactive stress threshold, typically labeled the soil precompression stress, σpc. The preload suction stress (PSS) was calculated as the product of initial (i.e., before loading) water suction and initial degree of pore water saturation. Multiple regressions were performed to evaluate the effect of soil properties (textural classes, volumetric water content, bulk density (BD), soil organic matter (SOM), and PSS) on σpc. The best model explained 39% of the variation in σpc, and indicated that σpc increases with increasing PSS, BD and SOM. For a given combination of clay, BD and SOM, PSS affected σpc negatively. We recommend our regression model for use in risk assessment tools for estimating sustainable traffic on agricultural soils. The model was validated by five independent data sets from the literature. Our study shows that caution should be applied when regarding σpc as a fixed threshold for compressive strength. We hypothesize that plastic deformation is initiated over a range of stress rather than at a distinctive single value. Further studies are needed to better understand—and potentially quantify—to what extent the predicted σpc can be regarded a central estimate of allowable stress for a given soil.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAdvances in Agronomy
EditorsDonald L. Sparks
Number of pages45
Volume178
Place of publicationCambridge
PublisherAcademic Press
Publication dateJan 2023
Pages61-105
ISBN (Print)9780443192609
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2023
SeriesAdvances in Agronomy
Volume178
ISSN0065-2113

Keywords

  • Pedotransfer function
  • Precompression stress
  • Risk assessment
  • Soil compaction
  • Soil degradation
  • Soil strength
  • Suction stress
  • Sustainability
  • Uniaxial compression test

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The challenge in estimating soil compressive strength for use in risk assessment of soil compaction in field traffic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this