Aarhus University Seal

Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey. / Lieberoth, Andreas; Lin, Shiang-Yi; Stöckli, Sabrina et al.
In: Royal Society Open Science, Vol. 8, No. 2, 200589, 02.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Lieberoth, A, Lin, S-Y, Stöckli, S, Han, H, Kowal, M, Rebekah, G, Chrona, S, Tran, TP, Jeftíc, A, Rasmussen, J, Cakal, H, Milfont, TL & The COVIDiSTRESS global survey consortium 2021, 'Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey', Royal Society Open Science, vol. 8, no. 2, 200589. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200589

APA

Lieberoth, A., Lin, S-Y., Stöckli, S., Han, H., Kowal, M., Rebekah, G., Chrona, S., Tran, T. P., Jeftíc, A., Rasmussen, J., Cakal, H., Milfont, T. L., & The COVIDiSTRESS global survey consortium (2021). Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey. Royal Society Open Science, 8(2), Article 200589. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200589

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Lieberoth A, Lin S-Y, Stöckli S, Han H, Kowal M, Rebekah G et al. Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey. Royal Society Open Science. 2021 Feb;8(2):200589. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200589

Author

Bibtex

@article{a0b9d11ac65d4570b9fd0d2d407d4dde,
title = "Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey",
abstract = "The objective of the present analysis is to understand relationships between psychological responses in the early months of global coronavirus restrictions and help understand how different governmentmeasures succeed or fail in changing public behaviour. There were variations between and within countries. Although Western Europeans registered as more concerned over COVID-19, more stressed, and having slightly more trust in the governments{\textquoteright} efforts, there was no clear geographical pattern in compliance with behavioural measures. Detailed plots illustrating betweencountries differences are provided. Using both traditional and Bayesian analyses, we found thatindividuals who worried about getting sick worked harder to protect themselves and others.However, concern about the coronavirus itself did not account for all of the variances in experienced stress during the early months of COVID-19 restrictions. More alarmingly, such stress was associated with less compliance. Further, those most concerned over the coronavirus trusted in government measures primarily where policies were strict. While concern over a disease is a source of mental distress, other factors including strictness of protective measures, social support and personal lockdown conditions must also be taken into consideration to fully appreciate the psychological impact of COVID-19 and to understand why some people fail to follow behavioural guidelines intended to protect themselves and others from infection. The Stage 1 manuscript associated with this submission received in-principle acceptance (IPA) on 18 May 2020. FollowingIPA, the accepted Stage 1 version of the manuscript was preregistered on the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/g2t3b. This preregistration was performed prior to data analysis.",
keywords = "Samfund/samtid, Trivsel, behavioral measures, behavioral sciences, compliance, covid-19, open science, psychology, registered report, social support, stress, trust, worry",
author = "Andreas Lieberoth and Shiang-Yi Lin and Sabrina St{\"o}ckli and Hyemin Han and Marta Kowal and Gelp{\'i} Rebekah and Stavroula Chrona and Tran, {Thao P} and Alma Jeft{\'i}c and Jesper Rasmussen and Huseyin Cakal and Milfont, {Taciano L.} and {The COVIDiSTRESS global survey consortium}",
year = "2021",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1098/rsos.200589",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Royal Society Open Science",
issn = "2054-5703",
publisher = "ROYAL SOC",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic

T2 - relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey

AU - Lieberoth, Andreas

AU - Lin, Shiang-Yi

AU - Stöckli, Sabrina

AU - Han, Hyemin

AU - Kowal, Marta

AU - Rebekah, Gelpí

AU - Chrona, Stavroula

AU - Tran, Thao P

AU - Jeftíc, Alma

AU - Rasmussen, Jesper

AU - Cakal, Huseyin

AU - Milfont, Taciano L.

AU - The COVIDiSTRESS global survey consortium

PY - 2021/2

Y1 - 2021/2

N2 - The objective of the present analysis is to understand relationships between psychological responses in the early months of global coronavirus restrictions and help understand how different governmentmeasures succeed or fail in changing public behaviour. There were variations between and within countries. Although Western Europeans registered as more concerned over COVID-19, more stressed, and having slightly more trust in the governments’ efforts, there was no clear geographical pattern in compliance with behavioural measures. Detailed plots illustrating betweencountries differences are provided. Using both traditional and Bayesian analyses, we found thatindividuals who worried about getting sick worked harder to protect themselves and others.However, concern about the coronavirus itself did not account for all of the variances in experienced stress during the early months of COVID-19 restrictions. More alarmingly, such stress was associated with less compliance. Further, those most concerned over the coronavirus trusted in government measures primarily where policies were strict. While concern over a disease is a source of mental distress, other factors including strictness of protective measures, social support and personal lockdown conditions must also be taken into consideration to fully appreciate the psychological impact of COVID-19 and to understand why some people fail to follow behavioural guidelines intended to protect themselves and others from infection. The Stage 1 manuscript associated with this submission received in-principle acceptance (IPA) on 18 May 2020. FollowingIPA, the accepted Stage 1 version of the manuscript was preregistered on the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/g2t3b. This preregistration was performed prior to data analysis.

AB - The objective of the present analysis is to understand relationships between psychological responses in the early months of global coronavirus restrictions and help understand how different governmentmeasures succeed or fail in changing public behaviour. There were variations between and within countries. Although Western Europeans registered as more concerned over COVID-19, more stressed, and having slightly more trust in the governments’ efforts, there was no clear geographical pattern in compliance with behavioural measures. Detailed plots illustrating betweencountries differences are provided. Using both traditional and Bayesian analyses, we found thatindividuals who worried about getting sick worked harder to protect themselves and others.However, concern about the coronavirus itself did not account for all of the variances in experienced stress during the early months of COVID-19 restrictions. More alarmingly, such stress was associated with less compliance. Further, those most concerned over the coronavirus trusted in government measures primarily where policies were strict. While concern over a disease is a source of mental distress, other factors including strictness of protective measures, social support and personal lockdown conditions must also be taken into consideration to fully appreciate the psychological impact of COVID-19 and to understand why some people fail to follow behavioural guidelines intended to protect themselves and others from infection. The Stage 1 manuscript associated with this submission received in-principle acceptance (IPA) on 18 May 2020. FollowingIPA, the accepted Stage 1 version of the manuscript was preregistered on the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/g2t3b. This preregistration was performed prior to data analysis.

KW - Samfund/samtid

KW - Trivsel

KW - behavioral measures

KW - behavioral sciences

KW - compliance

KW - covid-19

KW - open science

KW - psychology

KW - registered report

KW - social support

KW - stress

KW - trust

KW - worry

U2 - 10.1098/rsos.200589

DO - 10.1098/rsos.200589

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33972837

VL - 8

JO - Royal Society Open Science

JF - Royal Society Open Science

SN - 2054-5703

IS - 2

M1 - 200589

ER -