Aarhus University Seal / Aarhus Universitets segl

Special and Differential Treatments provisions in the TRIPs negotiations

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Special and Differential Treatments provisions in the TRIPs negotiations. / Alavi, Amin.

In: Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2008, p. 55-58.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Alavi, A 2008, 'Special and Differential Treatments provisions in the TRIPs negotiations', Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 55-58. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpm208

APA

Alavi, A. (2008). Special and Differential Treatments provisions in the TRIPs negotiations. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 3(1), 55-58. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpm208

CBE

Alavi A. 2008. Special and Differential Treatments provisions in the TRIPs negotiations. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 3(1):55-58. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpm208

MLA

Alavi, Amin. "Special and Differential Treatments provisions in the TRIPs negotiations". Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 2008, 3(1). 55-58. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpm208

Vancouver

Alavi A. Special and Differential Treatments provisions in the TRIPs negotiations. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 2008;3(1):55-58. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpm208

Author

Alavi, Amin. / Special and Differential Treatments provisions in the TRIPs negotiations. In: Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 2008 ; Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 55-58.

Bibtex

@article{27a87ef0c83811dc9550000ea68e967b,
title = "Special and Differential Treatments provisions in the TRIPs negotiations",
abstract = " A fundamental concept in our understanding of justice is the nature of equality of legal responsibility, which is the basis upon which World Trade Organization (WTO) membership and adherence to the TRIPs Agreement is based. In reality, however, while an ideal world would require all countries to provide the same level of IP protection, the imbalances between groups of countries in terms of their wealth, educational, and natural resources and their manufacturing capabilities mean that the equal treatment of patent protection internationally perpetuates inequalities at other levels. In reviewing the present state of Special and Differential Treatment negotiations as they affect the ability of some of the world's least developed nations to seek the relaxation of compulsory patent licensing norms, the author reflects the delicate balance between human need, economic power, and diplomatic nicety that has led to a position of virtual deadlock.",
keywords = "International Immaterialret, WTO, patents, TRIPs, Developing countries",
author = "Amin Alavi",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1093/jiplp/jpm208",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "55--58",
journal = "Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice",
issn = "1747-1532",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Special and Differential Treatments provisions in the TRIPs negotiations

AU - Alavi, Amin

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 -  A fundamental concept in our understanding of justice is the nature of equality of legal responsibility, which is the basis upon which World Trade Organization (WTO) membership and adherence to the TRIPs Agreement is based. In reality, however, while an ideal world would require all countries to provide the same level of IP protection, the imbalances between groups of countries in terms of their wealth, educational, and natural resources and their manufacturing capabilities mean that the equal treatment of patent protection internationally perpetuates inequalities at other levels. In reviewing the present state of Special and Differential Treatment negotiations as they affect the ability of some of the world's least developed nations to seek the relaxation of compulsory patent licensing norms, the author reflects the delicate balance between human need, economic power, and diplomatic nicety that has led to a position of virtual deadlock.

AB -  A fundamental concept in our understanding of justice is the nature of equality of legal responsibility, which is the basis upon which World Trade Organization (WTO) membership and adherence to the TRIPs Agreement is based. In reality, however, while an ideal world would require all countries to provide the same level of IP protection, the imbalances between groups of countries in terms of their wealth, educational, and natural resources and their manufacturing capabilities mean that the equal treatment of patent protection internationally perpetuates inequalities at other levels. In reviewing the present state of Special and Differential Treatment negotiations as they affect the ability of some of the world's least developed nations to seek the relaxation of compulsory patent licensing norms, the author reflects the delicate balance between human need, economic power, and diplomatic nicety that has led to a position of virtual deadlock.

KW - International Immaterialret

KW - WTO

KW - patents

KW - TRIPs

KW - Developing countries

U2 - 10.1093/jiplp/jpm208

DO - 10.1093/jiplp/jpm208

M3 - Journal article

VL - 3

SP - 55

EP - 58

JO - Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice

JF - Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice

SN - 1747-1532

IS - 1

ER -