Aarhus University Seal

Speaking Truth to Power: Political Advisers’ and Civil Servants’ Responses to Perceived Harmful Policy Proposals

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review



  • Birgitta Niklasson, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Peter Munk Christiansen
  • Patrik Öhberg, University of Gothenburg, Sweden

How are civil servants and politically appointed advisers likely to respond to policy proposals that they believe will harm their countries severely even if they are legal? Based on the different loyalties and roles of political advisors (PA) and civil servants (CS), we hypothesise that (1) PAs are more likely to voice internally, (2) CSs are more likely to voice externally and (3) CSs in functionally politicised systems are more likely to stay silent. These hypotheses are tested on - and partially supported by - data collected through two surveys directed to the ministerial staffs in Denmark and Sweden. PAs are more likely to voice internally, but none of the two groups is particularly keen to voice externally. The propensity to voice concerns in case of perceived harmful policy proposals depends on the kind as well as the level of politicisation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Public Policy
Pages (from-to)492-512
Number of pages21
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2020

    Research areas

  • bureaucratic responses, civil servants, ministerial advice, political advisers, politicisation, POLITICIZATION, RESPONSIVENESS, LOYALTY, COMPETENCE, OPTIONS, VOICE, DISSATISFACTION, EXIT

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 136861250