TY - JOUR
T1 - Simple Management Changes Drastically Reduce Pig House Methane Emission in Combined Experimental and Modeling Study
AU - Dalby, Frederik Rask
AU - Hansen, Michael Jørgen
AU - Guldberg, Lise Bonne
AU - Hafner, Sasha Daniel
AU - Feilberg, Anders
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Reducing methane from livestock slurry is one of the quickest ways to counteract global warming. A straightforward strategy is to reduce slurry retention time inside pig houses by frequent transfer to outside storages, where temperature and therefore microbial activity are lower. We demonstrate three frequent slurry removal strategies in pig houses in a year-round continuous measurement campaign. Slurry funnels, slurry trays, and weekly flushing reduced slurry methane emission by 89, 81, and 53%, respectively. Slurry funnels and slurry trays reduced ammonia emission by 25-30%. An extended version of the anaerobic biodegradation model (ABM) was fitted and validated using barn measurements. It was then applied for predicting storage emission and shows that there is a risk of negating barn methane reductions due to increased emission from outside storage. Therefore, we recommend combining the removal strategies with anaerobic digestion pre-storage or storage mitigation technologies such as slurry acidification. However, even without storage mitigation technologies, predicted net methane reduction from pig houses and following outside storage was at least 30% for all slurry removal strategies.
AB - Reducing methane from livestock slurry is one of the quickest ways to counteract global warming. A straightforward strategy is to reduce slurry retention time inside pig houses by frequent transfer to outside storages, where temperature and therefore microbial activity are lower. We demonstrate three frequent slurry removal strategies in pig houses in a year-round continuous measurement campaign. Slurry funnels, slurry trays, and weekly flushing reduced slurry methane emission by 89, 81, and 53%, respectively. Slurry funnels and slurry trays reduced ammonia emission by 25-30%. An extended version of the anaerobic biodegradation model (ABM) was fitted and validated using barn measurements. It was then applied for predicting storage emission and shows that there is a risk of negating barn methane reductions due to increased emission from outside storage. Therefore, we recommend combining the removal strategies with anaerobic digestion pre-storage or storage mitigation technologies such as slurry acidification. However, even without storage mitigation technologies, predicted net methane reduction from pig houses and following outside storage was at least 30% for all slurry removal strategies.
KW - emission
KW - management
KW - methane
KW - modeling
KW - pigs
KW - slurry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148770932&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.2c08891
DO - 10.1021/acs.est.2c08891
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 36808979
AN - SCOPUS:85148770932
SN - 0013-936X
VL - 57
SP - 3990
EP - 4002
JO - Environmental Science and Technology
JF - Environmental Science and Technology
IS - 9
ER -