Salience of infectious diseases did not increase xenophobia during the COVID-19 pandemic

Lei Fan*, Joshua M. Tybur, Paul A.M. Van Lange

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Multiple proposals suggest that xenophobia increases when infectious disease threats are salient. The current longitudinal study tested this hypothesis by examining whether and how anti-immigrant sentiments varied in the Netherlands across four time points during the COVID-19 pandemic (May 2020, February 2021, October 2021 and June 2022 through Flycatcher.eu). The results revealed that (1) anti-immigrant sentiments were no higher in early assessments, when COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths were high, than in later assessments, when COVID-19 hospitalizations were low, and (2) within-person changes in explicit disease concerns and disgust sensitivity did not relate to anti-immigrant sentiments, although stable individual differences in disgust sensitivity did. These findings suggest that anecdotal accounts of increased xenophobia during the pandemic did not generalize to the population sampled from here. They also suggest that not all increases in ecological pathogen threats and disease salience increase xenophobia.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere34
JournalEvolutionary Human Sciences
Volume6
ISSN2513-843X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2024

Keywords

  • behavioural immune system
  • COVID-19
  • disgust
  • health
  • xenophobia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Salience of infectious diseases did not increase xenophobia during the COVID-19 pandemic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this