Roadblocks to citizenship: selection effects of restrictive naturalisation rules

Kristian Kriegbaum Jensen*, Per Mouritsen, Emily Cochran Bech, Tore Vincents Olsen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

With rising requirements for citizenship across Western Europe, Denmark is one of the restrictive ‘leaders,’ with tough rules for language ability, economic self-support, and a clean criminal record. But what do these restrictions mean for newcomers’ ability to qualify, and how does this differ between different types of immigrants? Using register data on refugees and family migrants who immigrated to Denmark between 2001 and 2009, we show that tough language requirements exclude more people than self-support and crime rules, and many cannot qualify even after 13 years in the country. Across groups, education level at entry is the biggest predictor of whether and when newcomers qualify. These findings raise questions about the liberal nature of such requirements and about the future of democratic inclusion in Western Europe.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
Volume47
Issue5
Pages (from-to)1047-1065
Number of pages19
ISSN1369-183X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Citizenship
  • civic integration
  • exclusion
  • family migrants
  • naturalisation
  • refugees

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Roadblocks to citizenship: selection effects of restrictive naturalisation rules'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this