Aarhus University Seal

Resistance or Capitulation? How Discrete Emotions Shape Citizens’ Interactions With the Administrative State

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Elizabeth Bell, Florida State University
  • ,
  • Julian Christensen
  • ,
  • Kristina Jessen Hansen, Aalborg University

Public administration researchers have found that unfavorable state actions can trigger negative emotions in citizens, but the behavioral consequences of these emotions have been understudied. We draw on psychological insights to predict how discrete emotional responses to unfavorable interactions with the state (specifically: administrative decisions to deny access to public benefits) will predict citizens’ coping behaviors, such as whether they voice grievances, file complaints, and seek information. We test our hypotheses using a survey of applicants of a notoriously burdensome, means-tested tuition-free college program in Oklahoma, USA. In line with our theoretical framework, we find anger increases opposition behaviors in reaction to losses of access to the program, whereas shame reduces opposition among citizens. We also find that fear increases information-seeking and resistance behaviors. The results demonstrate the role of discrete emotions in predicting state-directed citizen behaviors, but also provide the groundwork for applying the discrete emotions framework to other actors, such as public managers and street-level bureaucrats.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAmerican Review of Public Administration
Pages (from-to)535-557
Number of pages23
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2022

    Research areas

  • administrative burden, citizen–state interactions, discrete emotions, education policy

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 295801946