Research Priorities in Critical Care Cardiology: JACC Expert Panel

P. Elliott Miller; Kurt Huber; Erin A. Bohula; Konstantin A. Krychtiuk; Janine Pöss; Robert O. Roswell; Guido Tavazzi; Michael A. Solomon; Steen D. Kristensen; David A. Morrow; ACC's Critical Care Cardiology Member Section and the ESC Association for Acute CardioVascular Care

doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.828

Research Priorities in Critical Care Cardiology: JACC Expert Panel

P. Elliott Miller^*, Kurt Huber, Erin A. Bohula, Konstantin A. Krychtiuk, Janine Pöss, Robert O. Roswell, Guido Tavazzi, Michael A. Solomon, Steen D. Kristensen, David A. Morrow, ACC's Critical Care Cardiology Member Section and the ESC Association for Acute CardioVascular Care

^*Corresponding author for this work

Department of Clinical Medicine - The Department of Cardiological Medicine B

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Review › Research › peer-review

Abstract

Over the last several decades, the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) has seen a substantial evolution in the patient population, comorbidities, and diagnoses. However, the generation of high-quality evidence to manage these complex and critically ill patients has been slow. Given the scarcity of clinical trials focused on critical care cardiology (CCC), CICU clinicians are often left to extrapolate from studies that either exclude or poorly represent the patient population admitted to CICUs. The lack of high-quality evidence and limited guidance from society guidelines has led to significant variation in practice patterns for many of the most common CICU diagnoses. Several barriers, both common to critical care research and unique to CCC, have impeded progress. In this multinational perspective, we describe key areas of priority for CCC research, current challenges for investigation in the CICU, and essential elements of a path forward for the field.

Original language	English
Journal	Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume	82
Issue	24
Pages (from-to)	2329-2337
Number of pages	9
ISSN	0735-1097
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.828
Publication status	Published - Dec 2023

Keywords

cardiac intensive care unit
mechanical circulatory support
research methods
shock

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.828

Cite this

Miller, P. E., Huber, K., Bohula, E. A., Krychtiuk, K. A., Pöss, J., Roswell, R. O., Tavazzi, G., Solomon, M. A., Kristensen, S. D., Morrow, D. A., & ACC's Critical Care Cardiology Member Section and the ESC Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (2023). Research Priorities in Critical Care Cardiology: JACC Expert Panel. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 82(24), 2329-2337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.828

@article{5a4bd66905a941b98decdd1a881cb801,

title = "Research Priorities in Critical Care Cardiology: JACC Expert Panel",

abstract = "Over the last several decades, the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) has seen a substantial evolution in the patient population, comorbidities, and diagnoses. However, the generation of high-quality evidence to manage these complex and critically ill patients has been slow. Given the scarcity of clinical trials focused on critical care cardiology (CCC), CICU clinicians are often left to extrapolate from studies that either exclude or poorly represent the patient population admitted to CICUs. The lack of high-quality evidence and limited guidance from society guidelines has led to significant variation in practice patterns for many of the most common CICU diagnoses. Several barriers, both common to critical care research and unique to CCC, have impeded progress. In this multinational perspective, we describe key areas of priority for CCC research, current challenges for investigation in the CICU, and essential elements of a path forward for the field.",

keywords = "cardiac intensive care unit, mechanical circulatory support, research methods, shock",

author = "Miller, {P. Elliott} and Kurt Huber and Bohula, {Erin A.} and Krychtiuk, {Konstantin A.} and Janine P{\"o}ss and Roswell, {Robert O.} and Guido Tavazzi and Solomon, {Michael A.} and Kristensen, {Steen D.} and Morrow, {David A.} and {ACC's Critical Care Cardiology Member Section and the ESC Association for Acute CardioVascular Care}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation",

year = "2023",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.828",

language = "English",

volume = "82",

pages = "2329--2337",

journal = "Journal of the American College of Cardiology",

issn = "0735-1097",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "24",

}

Miller, PE, Huber, K, Bohula, EA, Krychtiuk, KA, Pöss, J, Roswell, RO, Tavazzi, G, Solomon, MA, Kristensen, SD, Morrow, DA & ACC's Critical Care Cardiology Member Section and the ESC Association for Acute CardioVascular Care 2023, 'Research Priorities in Critical Care Cardiology: JACC Expert Panel', Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 82, no. 24, pp. 2329-2337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.828

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research Priorities in Critical Care Cardiology

T2 - JACC Expert Panel

AU - Miller, P. Elliott

AU - Huber, Kurt

AU - Bohula, Erin A.

AU - Krychtiuk, Konstantin A.

AU - Pöss, Janine

AU - Roswell, Robert O.

AU - Tavazzi, Guido

AU - Solomon, Michael A.

AU - Kristensen, Steen D.

AU - Morrow, David A.

AU - ACC's Critical Care Cardiology Member Section and the ESC Association for Acute CardioVascular Care

PY - 2023/12

Y1 - 2023/12

N2 - Over the last several decades, the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) has seen a substantial evolution in the patient population, comorbidities, and diagnoses. However, the generation of high-quality evidence to manage these complex and critically ill patients has been slow. Given the scarcity of clinical trials focused on critical care cardiology (CCC), CICU clinicians are often left to extrapolate from studies that either exclude or poorly represent the patient population admitted to CICUs. The lack of high-quality evidence and limited guidance from society guidelines has led to significant variation in practice patterns for many of the most common CICU diagnoses. Several barriers, both common to critical care research and unique to CCC, have impeded progress. In this multinational perspective, we describe key areas of priority for CCC research, current challenges for investigation in the CICU, and essential elements of a path forward for the field.

AB - Over the last several decades, the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) has seen a substantial evolution in the patient population, comorbidities, and diagnoses. However, the generation of high-quality evidence to manage these complex and critically ill patients has been slow. Given the scarcity of clinical trials focused on critical care cardiology (CCC), CICU clinicians are often left to extrapolate from studies that either exclude or poorly represent the patient population admitted to CICUs. The lack of high-quality evidence and limited guidance from society guidelines has led to significant variation in practice patterns for many of the most common CICU diagnoses. Several barriers, both common to critical care research and unique to CCC, have impeded progress. In this multinational perspective, we describe key areas of priority for CCC research, current challenges for investigation in the CICU, and essential elements of a path forward for the field.

KW - cardiac intensive care unit

KW - mechanical circulatory support

KW - research methods

KW - shock

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85178194531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.828

DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.828

M3 - Review

C2 - 38057075

AN - SCOPUS:85178194531

SN - 0735-1097

VL - 82

SP - 2329

EP - 2337

JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

IS - 24

ER -

Research Priorities in Critical Care Cardiology: JACC Expert Panel

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this