Find

School of Communication and Culture

Reassembling Surveillance Creep

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Reassembling Surveillance Creep. / Bøge, Ask Risom; Lauritsen, Peter.

In: Akademisk Kvarter, Vol. 15, 10.2017, p. 27-39.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Bøge, AR & Lauritsen, P 2017, 'Reassembling Surveillance Creep', Akademisk Kvarter, vol. 15, pp. 27-39. <http://www.akademiskkvarter.hum.aau.dk/pdf/vol15/2.ARBøgePLauritsen_ReassemblingSurveillanceCreep.pdf>

APA

Bøge, A. R., & Lauritsen, P. (2017). Reassembling Surveillance Creep. Akademisk Kvarter, 15, 27-39. http://www.akademiskkvarter.hum.aau.dk/pdf/vol15/2.ARBøgePLauritsen_ReassemblingSurveillanceCreep.pdf

CBE

Bøge AR, Lauritsen P. 2017. Reassembling Surveillance Creep. Akademisk Kvarter. 15:27-39.

MLA

Bøge, Ask Risom and Peter Lauritsen. "Reassembling Surveillance Creep". Akademisk Kvarter. 2017, 15. 27-39.

Vancouver

Bøge AR, Lauritsen P. Reassembling Surveillance Creep. Akademisk Kvarter. 2017 Oct;15:27-39.

Author

Bøge, Ask Risom ; Lauritsen, Peter. / Reassembling Surveillance Creep. In: Akademisk Kvarter. 2017 ; Vol. 15. pp. 27-39.

Bibtex

@article{22f6f8930c4a47e6aa2de757fbdbc1c1,

title = "Reassembling Surveillance Creep",

abstract = "We live in societies in which surveillance technologies are constantly introduced, are transformed, and spread to new practices for new purposes. How and why does this happen? In other words, why does surveillance “creep”? This question has received little attention either in theoretical development or in empirical analyses. Accordingly, this article contributes to this special issue on the usefulness of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) by suggesting that ANT can advance our understanding of {\textquoteleft}surveillance creep{\textquoteright}. Based on ANT{\textquoteright}s model of translation and a historical study of the Danish DNA database, we argue that surveillance creep involves reassembling the relations in surveillance networks between heterogeneous actors such as the watchers, the watched, laws, and technologies. Second, surveillance creeps only when these heterogeneous actors are adequately interested and aligned. However, obtaining and maintaining such alignment may be difficult.",

keywords = "Actor-Network Theory, Surveillance creep, DNA database, Overv{\aa}gning, Surveillance creep, DNA-register",

author = "B{\o}ge, {Ask Risom} and Peter Lauritsen",

year = "2017",

month = oct,

language = "English",

volume = "15",

pages = "27--39",

journal = "Akademisk Kvarter",

issn = "1904-0008",

publisher = "Aalborg Universitetsforlag",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reassembling Surveillance Creep

AU - Bøge, Ask Risom

AU - Lauritsen, Peter

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - We live in societies in which surveillance technologies are constantly introduced, are transformed, and spread to new practices for new purposes. How and why does this happen? In other words, why does surveillance “creep”? This question has received little attention either in theoretical development or in empirical analyses. Accordingly, this article contributes to this special issue on the usefulness of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) by suggesting that ANT can advance our understanding of ‘surveillance creep’. Based on ANT’s model of translation and a historical study of the Danish DNA database, we argue that surveillance creep involves reassembling the relations in surveillance networks between heterogeneous actors such as the watchers, the watched, laws, and technologies. Second, surveillance creeps only when these heterogeneous actors are adequately interested and aligned. However, obtaining and maintaining such alignment may be difficult.

AB - We live in societies in which surveillance technologies are constantly introduced, are transformed, and spread to new practices for new purposes. How and why does this happen? In other words, why does surveillance “creep”? This question has received little attention either in theoretical development or in empirical analyses. Accordingly, this article contributes to this special issue on the usefulness of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) by suggesting that ANT can advance our understanding of ‘surveillance creep’. Based on ANT’s model of translation and a historical study of the Danish DNA database, we argue that surveillance creep involves reassembling the relations in surveillance networks between heterogeneous actors such as the watchers, the watched, laws, and technologies. Second, surveillance creeps only when these heterogeneous actors are adequately interested and aligned. However, obtaining and maintaining such alignment may be difficult.

KW - Actor-Network Theory

KW - Surveillance creep

KW - DNA database

KW - Overvågning

KW - Surveillance creep

KW - DNA-register

M3 - Journal article

VL - 15

SP - 27

EP - 39

JO - Akademisk Kvarter

JF - Akademisk Kvarter

SN - 1904-0008

ER -