Aarhus University Seal / Aarhus Universitets segl

Reading, writing, rebelling: Propositions for a renewed critical stance

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Reading, writing, rebelling : Propositions for a renewed critical stance. / Doubinsky, Sebastien.

In: Caracteres, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.05.2017, p. 138-174.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{15666c5531ab4e259634a664cb124e1d,
title = "Reading, writing, rebelling: Propositions for a renewed critical stance",
abstract = "What is reading? What is writing? What connects the two? These questions have been the fertile ground for many literary and philosophical theories, from New Criticism to Deconstruction. This essay does not pretend answering to these two questions, but rather to question the question themselves and try to shed a different light of this essential problematic. Choosing not to consider literature as a stable concept, but rather as an ontologically impermanent one, I try to reflect upon the terms that condition our approach of works and of the creation of these works. In a large perspective, the notions of “reading” and “writing” are examined through the prism of their incarnations as “works”, and the consequences of this identity have on our critical discourse. In order to read critically, one must thus recognize this immanent instability of our notions and definitions, and begin from there instead of ending there. In other words, the instability of the reading is the only way to mirror the instability of the works, and to acknowledge their ever-changing form. Far from being innocent, critical reading therefore appears as a radical, but necessary action, a rebellion against the obvious and accepted definitions to which works are too often attached.",
keywords = "Criticism, reading, writing, rebellion, impermanent",
author = "Sebastien Doubinsky",
note = "Escritor y acad{\'e}mico biling{\"u}e. Su campo principal de investigaci{\'o}n es la Work Reading Theory. Es coautor, junto a Tabish Khair, de Reading Literature Today, publicado por SAGE. En la actualidad es profesor de literatura, historia y cultura francesas en la Universidad de Aarhus (Dinamarca) ",
year = "2017",
month = may,
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "138--174",
journal = "Caracteres",
issn = "2254-4496",
publisher = "Editorial Delirio",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reading, writing, rebelling

T2 - Propositions for a renewed critical stance

AU - Doubinsky, Sebastien

N1 - Escritor y académico bilingüe. Su campo principal de investigación es la Work Reading Theory. Es coautor, junto a Tabish Khair, de Reading Literature Today, publicado por SAGE. En la actualidad es profesor de literatura, historia y cultura francesas en la Universidad de Aarhus (Dinamarca)

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - What is reading? What is writing? What connects the two? These questions have been the fertile ground for many literary and philosophical theories, from New Criticism to Deconstruction. This essay does not pretend answering to these two questions, but rather to question the question themselves and try to shed a different light of this essential problematic. Choosing not to consider literature as a stable concept, but rather as an ontologically impermanent one, I try to reflect upon the terms that condition our approach of works and of the creation of these works. In a large perspective, the notions of “reading” and “writing” are examined through the prism of their incarnations as “works”, and the consequences of this identity have on our critical discourse. In order to read critically, one must thus recognize this immanent instability of our notions and definitions, and begin from there instead of ending there. In other words, the instability of the reading is the only way to mirror the instability of the works, and to acknowledge their ever-changing form. Far from being innocent, critical reading therefore appears as a radical, but necessary action, a rebellion against the obvious and accepted definitions to which works are too often attached.

AB - What is reading? What is writing? What connects the two? These questions have been the fertile ground for many literary and philosophical theories, from New Criticism to Deconstruction. This essay does not pretend answering to these two questions, but rather to question the question themselves and try to shed a different light of this essential problematic. Choosing not to consider literature as a stable concept, but rather as an ontologically impermanent one, I try to reflect upon the terms that condition our approach of works and of the creation of these works. In a large perspective, the notions of “reading” and “writing” are examined through the prism of their incarnations as “works”, and the consequences of this identity have on our critical discourse. In order to read critically, one must thus recognize this immanent instability of our notions and definitions, and begin from there instead of ending there. In other words, the instability of the reading is the only way to mirror the instability of the works, and to acknowledge their ever-changing form. Far from being innocent, critical reading therefore appears as a radical, but necessary action, a rebellion against the obvious and accepted definitions to which works are too often attached.

KW - Criticism, reading, writing, rebellion, impermanent

M3 - Journal article

VL - 6

SP - 138

EP - 174

JO - Caracteres

JF - Caracteres

SN - 2254-4496

IS - 1

ER -