TY - JOUR
T1 - Protocols and tools to enable reproducibility in 2D materials research
AU - Bøggild, Peter
AU - Booth, Timothy John
AU - Jessen, Bjarke Sørensen
AU - Shivayogimath, Abhay
AU - Lassaline, Nolan
AU - Hofmann, Stephan
AU - Burton, Oliver
AU - Daasbjerg, Kim
AU - Smith, Anders
AU - Nørgaard, Kasper
AU - Zurutuza, Amaia
AU - Barkan, Terrance
AU - Pollard, Andrew J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Springer Nature Limited 2025.
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Despite the rapid growth of 2D materials research over the past two decades in both academic and industrial settings, there remain big challenges in producing consistent, reproducible results in the field. Subtle variations in methods or materials can lead to drastically different outcomes, undermining reliability and slowing down advances. However, owing to a culture of placing greater value on novelty rather than on reproducibility, little effort is expended in ensuring that results are collected and presented in a way that enables reproducibility. This Expert Recommendation presents two protocols that researchers can follow to improve reproducibility in 2D materials science, as well as practical recommendations on how researchers can engage constructively with funders, publishers and industry to create a stronger basis for reproducibility, transparency and trust in the field.
AB - Despite the rapid growth of 2D materials research over the past two decades in both academic and industrial settings, there remain big challenges in producing consistent, reproducible results in the field. Subtle variations in methods or materials can lead to drastically different outcomes, undermining reliability and slowing down advances. However, owing to a culture of placing greater value on novelty rather than on reproducibility, little effort is expended in ensuring that results are collected and presented in a way that enables reproducibility. This Expert Recommendation presents two protocols that researchers can follow to improve reproducibility in 2D materials science, as well as practical recommendations on how researchers can engage constructively with funders, publishers and industry to create a stronger basis for reproducibility, transparency and trust in the field.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105018506110
U2 - 10.1038/s42254-025-00875-9
DO - 10.1038/s42254-025-00875-9
M3 - Review
AN - SCOPUS:105018506110
SN - 2522-5820
VL - 7
SP - 728
EP - 738
JO - Nature Reviews Physics
JF - Nature Reviews Physics
IS - 12
ER -