Progression of neuropathic pain after acute spinal cord injury: A meta-analysis and framework for clinical trials

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  • Freda M. Warner, The University of British Columbia
  • ,
  • Jacquelyn J. Cragg, The University of British Columbia, Balgrist University Hospital
  • ,
  • Catherine R. Jutzeler, The University of British Columbia
  • ,
  • Nanna B. Finnerup
  • Lars Werhagen, Karolinska Institut at Danderyds Hospital
  • ,
  • Norbert Weidner, University Hospital
  • ,
  • Doris Maier, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Klinik
  • ,
  • Yorck Bernhard Kalke, RKU Universitäts und Rehabilitationskliniken Ulm
  • ,
  • Armin Curt, Balgrist University Hospital, European Multi-Centre Study on Spinal Cord Injury (EMSCI) Study Group
  • ,
  • John L.K. Kramer, The University of British Columbia

The translation of therapeutic interventions to humans with spinal cord injury with the goal of promoting growth and repair in the central nervous system could, inadvertently, drive mechanisms associated with the development of neuropathic pain. A framework is needed to evaluate the probability that a therapeutic intervention for acute spinal cord injury modifies the progression of neuropathic pain. We analyzed a large, longitudinal dataset from the European Multi-Center Study about Spinal Cord Injury (EMSCI) and compared these observations with a previously published Swedish/Danish cohort. A meta-analysis was performed to produce aggregate estimates for the transition period between 1-6 months and the transition period between 1-12 months after injury. A secondary analysis used logistic regression to explore associations between the progression of neuropathic pain and demographics, pain characteristics, and injury characteristics. For overall neuropathic pain, 72% presenting with pain symptoms at one month reported persisting symptoms at six months, and 23% who did not have neuropathic pain at one month later had it develop. From 1-12 months, there was a similar likelihood of pain persisting (69%) and slightly higher rate of pain developing (36%). Characteristics that were significantly associated with the progression of pain included age and sensory and motor preservation. We provide historical benchmarks for estimating the progression of neuropathic pain during the first year after acute SCI. This information will be useful for comparison and evaluating safety during early phase acute spinal cord injury trials.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Neurotrauma
Volume36
Issue9
Pages (from-to)1461-1468
Number of pages8
ISSN0897-7151
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Research areas

  • incidence studies, neuropathic pain, spinal cord trauma

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 154018770