Aarhus University Seal

Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders : the challenge of implementing evidence

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders : the challenge of implementing evidence. / Loisel, P.; Buchbinder, R.; Hazard, R. et al.
In: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, Vol. 15, 2005, p. 507-524.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Loisel, P, Buchbinder, R, Hazard, R, Keller, R, Scheel, I, van Tulder, M & Webster, B 2005, 'Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders : the challenge of implementing evidence', Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, vol. 15, pp. 507-524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-005-8031-2

APA

Loisel, P., Buchbinder, R., Hazard, R., Keller, R., Scheel, I., van Tulder, M., & Webster, B. (2005). Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders : the challenge of implementing evidence. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15, 507-524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-005-8031-2

CBE

Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, Keller R, Scheel I, van Tulder M, Webster B. 2005. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders : the challenge of implementing evidence. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 15:507-524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-005-8031-2

MLA

Vancouver

Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, Keller R, Scheel I, van Tulder M et al. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders : the challenge of implementing evidence. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2005;15:507-524. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-8031-2

Author

Loisel, P. ; Buchbinder, R. ; Hazard, R. et al. / Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders : the challenge of implementing evidence. In: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2005 ; Vol. 15. pp. 507-524.

Bibtex

@article{17e994a0337946ffb9f56d3fc8135f2f,
title = "Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders : the challenge of implementing evidence",
abstract = "Background: The process of returning disabled workers to work presents numerous challenges. In spite of the growing evidence regarding work disability prevention, little uptake of this evidence has been observed. One reason for limited dissemination of evidence is the complexity of the problem, as it is subject to multiple legal, administrative, social, political, and cultural challenges. Purpose and methods: A literature review and collection of experts' opinion is presented, on the current evidence for work disability prevention, and barriers to evidence implementation. Recommendations are presented for enhancing implementation of research results. Conclusion: The current evidence regarding work disability prevention shows that some clinical interventions (advice to return to modified work and graded activity programs) and some non-clinical interventions (at a service and policy/community level but not at a practice level) are effective in reducing work absenteeism. Implementation of evidence in work disability is a major challenge because intervention recommendations are often imprecise and not yet practical for immediate use, many barriers exist, and many stakeholders are involved. Future studies should involve all relevant stakeholders and aim at developing new strategies that are effective, efficient, and have a potential for successful implementation. These studies should be based upon a clearer conceptualization of the broader context and inter-relationships that determine return to work outcomes. {\textcopyright} 2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.",
author = "P. Loisel and R. Buchbinder and R. Hazard and R. Keller and I. Scheel and {van Tulder}, M. and B. Webster",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1007/s10926-005-8031-2",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "507--524",
journal = "Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation",
issn = "1053-0487",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders : the challenge of implementing evidence

AU - Loisel, P.

AU - Buchbinder, R.

AU - Hazard, R.

AU - Keller, R.

AU - Scheel, I.

AU - van Tulder, M.

AU - Webster, B.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Background: The process of returning disabled workers to work presents numerous challenges. In spite of the growing evidence regarding work disability prevention, little uptake of this evidence has been observed. One reason for limited dissemination of evidence is the complexity of the problem, as it is subject to multiple legal, administrative, social, political, and cultural challenges. Purpose and methods: A literature review and collection of experts' opinion is presented, on the current evidence for work disability prevention, and barriers to evidence implementation. Recommendations are presented for enhancing implementation of research results. Conclusion: The current evidence regarding work disability prevention shows that some clinical interventions (advice to return to modified work and graded activity programs) and some non-clinical interventions (at a service and policy/community level but not at a practice level) are effective in reducing work absenteeism. Implementation of evidence in work disability is a major challenge because intervention recommendations are often imprecise and not yet practical for immediate use, many barriers exist, and many stakeholders are involved. Future studies should involve all relevant stakeholders and aim at developing new strategies that are effective, efficient, and have a potential for successful implementation. These studies should be based upon a clearer conceptualization of the broader context and inter-relationships that determine return to work outcomes. © 2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.

AB - Background: The process of returning disabled workers to work presents numerous challenges. In spite of the growing evidence regarding work disability prevention, little uptake of this evidence has been observed. One reason for limited dissemination of evidence is the complexity of the problem, as it is subject to multiple legal, administrative, social, political, and cultural challenges. Purpose and methods: A literature review and collection of experts' opinion is presented, on the current evidence for work disability prevention, and barriers to evidence implementation. Recommendations are presented for enhancing implementation of research results. Conclusion: The current evidence regarding work disability prevention shows that some clinical interventions (advice to return to modified work and graded activity programs) and some non-clinical interventions (at a service and policy/community level but not at a practice level) are effective in reducing work absenteeism. Implementation of evidence in work disability is a major challenge because intervention recommendations are often imprecise and not yet practical for immediate use, many barriers exist, and many stakeholders are involved. Future studies should involve all relevant stakeholders and aim at developing new strategies that are effective, efficient, and have a potential for successful implementation. These studies should be based upon a clearer conceptualization of the broader context and inter-relationships that determine return to work outcomes. © 2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.

U2 - 10.1007/s10926-005-8031-2

DO - 10.1007/s10926-005-8031-2

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 16254752

VL - 15

SP - 507

EP - 524

JO - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

SN - 1053-0487

ER -