Policy Makers Believe Money Motivates More Than It Does

Sebastian Jilke*, Florian Keppeler, John Ternovski, Dominik Vogel, Erez Yoeli

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

To motivate contributions to public goods, should policy makers employ financial incentives like taxes, fines, subsidies, and rewards? While these are widely considered as the classic policy approach, a substantial academic literature suggests the impact of financial incentives is not always positive; they can sometimes fail or even backfire. To test whether policy makers are overly bullish about financial incentives, we asked county heads, mayors, and municipal government representatives of medium-to-large towns in Germany to predict the effects of a financial incentive on COVID-19 vaccination, and tested the exact same incentive in a field experiment involving all 41,548 inhabitants (clustered in 10,032 addresses) of the German town of Ravensburg. Whereas policy makers overwhelmingly predict that the financial incentive will increase vaccination—by 15.3 percentage points on average—the same financial incentive yielded a precisely estimated null effect on vaccination. We discuss when financial incentives are most likely to fail, and conclude that it is critical to educate policy makers on the potential pitfalls of employing financial incentives to promote contributions to public goods.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1901
JournalScientific Reports
Volume14
Issue1
ISSN2045-2322
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jan 2024

Keywords

  • incentives
  • policy maker
  • vaccination
  • field experiment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Policy Makers Believe Money Motivates More Than It Does'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this