TY - JOUR
T1 - Pesticide residues with hazard classifications relevant to non-target species including humans are omnipresent in the environment and farmer residences
AU - Silva, Vera
AU - Gai, Lingtong
AU - Harkes, Paula
AU - Tan, Gaowei
AU - Ritsema, Coen J.
AU - Alcon, Francisco
AU - Contreras, Josefa
AU - Abrantes, Nelson
AU - Campos, Isabel
AU - Baldi, Isabelle
AU - Bureau, Mathilde
AU - Christ, Florian
AU - Mandrioli, Daniele
AU - Sgargi, Daria
AU - Pasković, Igor
AU - Polić Pasković, Marija
AU - Glavan, Matjaž
AU - Hofman, Jakub
AU - Huerta Lwanga, Esperanza
AU - Norgaard, Trine
AU - Bílková, Zuzana
AU - Osman, Rima
AU - Khurshid, Chrow
AU - Navarro, Irene
AU - de la Torre, Adrián
AU - Sanz, Paloma
AU - Ángeles Martínez, María
AU - Dias, Jonatan
AU - Mol, Hans
AU - Gort, Gerrit
AU - Martins Figueiredo, Daniel
AU - Scheepers, Paul T.J.
AU - Schlünssen, Vivi
AU - Vested, Anne
AU - Alaoui, Abdallah
AU - Geissen, Violette
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - Intensive and widespread use of pesticides raises serious environmental and human health concerns. The presence and levels of 209 pesticide residues (active substances and transformation products) in 625 environmental samples (201 soil, 193 crop, 20 outdoor air, 115 indoor dust, 58 surface water, and 38 sediment samples) have been studied. The samples were collected during the 2021 growing season, across 10 study sites, covering the main European crops, and conventional and organic farming systems. We profiled the pesticide residues found in the different matrices using existing hazard classifications towards non-target organisms and humans. Combining monitoring data and hazard information, we developed an indicator for the prioritization of pesticides, which can support policy decisions and sustainable pesticide use transitions. Eighty-six percent of the samples had at least one residue above the respective limit of detection. One hundred residues were found in soil, 112 in water, 99 in sediments, 78 in crops, 76 in outdoor air, and 197 in indoor dust. The number, levels, and profile of residues varied between farming systems. Our results show that non-approved compounds still represent a significant part of environmental cocktails and should be accounted for in monitoring programs and risk assessments. The hazard profiles analysis confirms the dominance of compounds of low-moderate hazard and underscores the high hazard of some approved compounds and recurring “no data available” situations. Overall, our results support the idea that risk should be assessed in a mixture context, taking environmentally relevant mixtures into consideration. We have uncovered uncertainties and data gaps that should be addressed, as well as the policy implications at the EU approval status level. Our newly introduced indicator can help identify research priority areas, and act as a reference for targeted scenarios set forth in the Farm to Fork pesticide reduction goals.
AB - Intensive and widespread use of pesticides raises serious environmental and human health concerns. The presence and levels of 209 pesticide residues (active substances and transformation products) in 625 environmental samples (201 soil, 193 crop, 20 outdoor air, 115 indoor dust, 58 surface water, and 38 sediment samples) have been studied. The samples were collected during the 2021 growing season, across 10 study sites, covering the main European crops, and conventional and organic farming systems. We profiled the pesticide residues found in the different matrices using existing hazard classifications towards non-target organisms and humans. Combining monitoring data and hazard information, we developed an indicator for the prioritization of pesticides, which can support policy decisions and sustainable pesticide use transitions. Eighty-six percent of the samples had at least one residue above the respective limit of detection. One hundred residues were found in soil, 112 in water, 99 in sediments, 78 in crops, 76 in outdoor air, and 197 in indoor dust. The number, levels, and profile of residues varied between farming systems. Our results show that non-approved compounds still represent a significant part of environmental cocktails and should be accounted for in monitoring programs and risk assessments. The hazard profiles analysis confirms the dominance of compounds of low-moderate hazard and underscores the high hazard of some approved compounds and recurring “no data available” situations. Overall, our results support the idea that risk should be assessed in a mixture context, taking environmentally relevant mixtures into consideration. We have uncovered uncertainties and data gaps that should be addressed, as well as the policy implications at the EU approval status level. Our newly introduced indicator can help identify research priority areas, and act as a reference for targeted scenarios set forth in the Farm to Fork pesticide reduction goals.
KW - Distribution
KW - Hazard
KW - Mixtures of pesticide residues
KW - Prioritization indicator
KW - SPRINT project
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175606738&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108280
DO - 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108280
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37924602
AN - SCOPUS:85175606738
SN - 0160-4120
VL - 181
JO - Environment International
JF - Environment International
M1 - 108280
ER -