Perspectives on the narrowing and clustering of research trajectories: an epistemic threat to medical progress?

Mark P. Khurana*, Emil Bargmann Madsen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Evidence suggests that a certain degree of clustering and narrowing of research trajectories is occurring, both on the individual and disease levels. Mechanisms of this process include biases in funding, a lack of coordination among funders, the significant funding role of for-profit actors, and lobbying by special interest groups. The implication is that fewer individuals might control the direction of research and certain diseases could garner a disproportionate amount of attention and resources, which could be an epistemic threat to medical progress. In this perspective article, we highlight the scale of the issue, mechanisms underlying this process, and their effects on medical progress. The article also explores potential solutions to counteract an excessive narrowing and clustering, highlighting the importance of individual researchers, patients, research organizations, and funders in ensuring that a sufficiently-diverse set of medical research trajectories are being pursued.

Original languageEnglish
JournalScience and Public Policy
Volume50
Issue3
Pages (from-to)559-563
Number of pages5
ISSN1471-5430
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2023

Keywords

  • clustering
  • health policy
  • medical research
  • progress studies
  • research policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perspectives on the narrowing and clustering of research trajectories: an epistemic threat to medical progress?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this