Department of Political Science

Personal Responsibility in Health and Healthcare: Luck Egalitarianism as a plausible and flexible approach to health

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

DOI

Allocating health care resources based on personal responsibility is a prominent and controversial idea. This article assesses the plausibility of such measures through the lens of luck egalitarianism, a prominent responsibility-sensitive theory of distributive justice. This article presents a framework of luck egalitarianism in health, which integrates other concerns of justice than health, is pluralist, and is compatible with a wide range of measures for giving lower priority to those deemed responsible. Applying this framework to oral health, the allocation of livers among potential transplant recipients and travel insurance demonstrates that this version of luck egalitarianism is a much more attractive and flexible theory than much of the contemporary discussion allows. This also pertains to its ability to provide plausible answers to two prominent critiques of harshness and intrusiveness. The discussion also shows that the luck egalitarian commitment to eliminating the influence of luck on people’s lives is likely to require substantial redistribution.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPolitical Research Quarterly
Volume73
Issue3
Pages (from-to)583-595
Number of pages13
ISSN1065-9129
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2020

    Research areas

  • distributive justice, health care justice, health justice, individual responsibility in health, luck egalitarianism, personal responsibility in health

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 143285697