Participatory design that matters—Facing the big issues

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Participatory design that matters—Facing the big issues. / Bødker, Susanne; Kyng, Morten.

In: ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 25, No. 1, 02.2018, p. 4:0-4:31.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Bødker, S & Kyng, M 2018, 'Participatory design that matters—Facing the big issues', ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 4:0-4:31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152421

APA

Bødker, S., & Kyng, M. (2018). Participatory design that matters—Facing the big issues. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 25(1), 4:0-4:31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152421

CBE

Bødker S, Kyng M. 2018. Participatory design that matters—Facing the big issues. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 25(1):4:0-4:31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152421

MLA

Vancouver

Bødker S, Kyng M. Participatory design that matters—Facing the big issues. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 2018 Feb;25(1):4:0-4:31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152421

Author

Bødker, Susanne ; Kyng, Morten. / Participatory design that matters—Facing the big issues. In: ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 2018 ; Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 4:0-4:31.

Bibtex

@article{8debe9055d154ac1af77b6ceaa1de8ef,
title = "Participatory design that matters—Facing the big issues",
abstract = "At a time where computer technology is putting human lives and work under pressure, we discuss how to provide alternatives. We look back at Participatory Design (PD) which was originally about possibilities and alternatives as much as it was about specific solutions. The paper aims to revitalize and revise PD to help people influence big issues. The agenda for this is set through proposing a set of key elements for realizing new, important possibilities. We discuss the possible changes of partnership with users, call for a new role of researchers as activists, debate how to work with demanding visions for lasting impact, and democratic control. We focus on high technological ambitions, on deployment of working prototypes, on alliances, and on scaling up, all seen as important for a PD that matters. We conclude the paper with an invitation to participate in the continued discussion, codesign, and realization of a PD that matters.",
keywords = "Alternatives, Participatory design",
author = "Susanne B{\o}dker and Morten Kyng",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1145/3152421",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "4:0--4:31",
journal = "A C M Transactions on Computer - Human Interaction",
issn = "1073-0516",
publisher = "ACM",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Participatory design that matters—Facing the big issues

AU - Bødker, Susanne

AU - Kyng, Morten

PY - 2018/2

Y1 - 2018/2

N2 - At a time where computer technology is putting human lives and work under pressure, we discuss how to provide alternatives. We look back at Participatory Design (PD) which was originally about possibilities and alternatives as much as it was about specific solutions. The paper aims to revitalize and revise PD to help people influence big issues. The agenda for this is set through proposing a set of key elements for realizing new, important possibilities. We discuss the possible changes of partnership with users, call for a new role of researchers as activists, debate how to work with demanding visions for lasting impact, and democratic control. We focus on high technological ambitions, on deployment of working prototypes, on alliances, and on scaling up, all seen as important for a PD that matters. We conclude the paper with an invitation to participate in the continued discussion, codesign, and realization of a PD that matters.

AB - At a time where computer technology is putting human lives and work under pressure, we discuss how to provide alternatives. We look back at Participatory Design (PD) which was originally about possibilities and alternatives as much as it was about specific solutions. The paper aims to revitalize and revise PD to help people influence big issues. The agenda for this is set through proposing a set of key elements for realizing new, important possibilities. We discuss the possible changes of partnership with users, call for a new role of researchers as activists, debate how to work with demanding visions for lasting impact, and democratic control. We focus on high technological ambitions, on deployment of working prototypes, on alliances, and on scaling up, all seen as important for a PD that matters. We conclude the paper with an invitation to participate in the continued discussion, codesign, and realization of a PD that matters.

KW - Alternatives

KW - Participatory design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042469010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/3152421

DO - 10.1145/3152421

M3 - Journal article

VL - 25

SP - 4:0-4:31

JO - A C M Transactions on Computer - Human Interaction

JF - A C M Transactions on Computer - Human Interaction

SN - 1073-0516

IS - 1

ER -