Nudging voters and encouraging pre-commitment: Beyond mandatory turnout

Viki Møller Lyngby Pedersen, Jens Damgaard Thaysen*, Andreas Albertsen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The discussion on mandatory turnout, which controversially introduces coercion at the heart of the electoral process, illustrates a dilemma between increasing voter turnout on the one hand and avoiding coercion on the other. If successful, a recent proposal by Elliott solves this dilemma as it removes the compulsory element of mandatory turnout. Specifically, Elliot reinterprets the policy’s purpose as (a) a pre-commitment device for those who believe that they have a duty to vote and (b) a nudge to the surveillance of politics for those who do not believe this. We critically evaluate Elliott’s novel intervention in the debate and argue that it is ultimately unsuccessful. Mandatory turnout can be interpreted as neither a pre-commitment device nor a nudge. Moreover, we present a more promising and novel solution to the dilemma: a genuine state-administered pre-commitment device with respect to voting that also nudges citizens to vote and seems prima facie attractive.

Original languageEnglish
JournalRes Publica
Volume30
Issue2
Pages (from-to) 267–283
Number of pages17
ISSN1356-4765
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024

Keywords

  • Compulsory voting
  • Mandated choice policies
  • Mandatory turnout
  • Nudging
  • Voting ethics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nudging voters and encouraging pre-commitment: Beyond mandatory turnout'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this