Aarhus University Seal / Aarhus Universitets segl

Non-invasive quantification of tumor blood flow in prostate cancer using 15O-H2O PET/CT

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Tumor blood flow (TBF) measurements in prostate cancer (PCa) provide an integrative index of tumor growth, which could be important for primary diagnosis and therapy response evaluation. 15O-water PET is the noninvasive gold standard but is technically demanding. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of three different non-invasive strategies with an invasively measured arterial input function (BSIF): Using image-derived input functions (IDIF) from either 1) a separate heart scan or 2) the pelvic scan or 3) a populations-based input function (PBIF). Nine patients with biopsy-verified PCa scheduled for prostatectomy were included. All patients were characterized with serum levels of PSA (s-PSA), multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and post-surgical histopathology Gleason Grade. Dynamic 15O-water was performed of the heart and the pelvic area 15 minutes apart. TBF estimated from both wash-in (K1) and wash-out (k2) constants was calculated using a one-compartmental model. Results: Mean (range) s-PSA was 12 (3-27) ng/mL, Gleason Grade Group was 2.9 (1-5), k2 was 0.44 (0.0071.2), and K1 was 0.24 (0.07-0.55) mL/mL/min. k2 (BSIF) correlated with s-PSA (r=0.86, P<0.01) and Gleason Grade Group (rho=0.78, P=0.01). BSIF, heart-IDIF and PBIF provided near-identical k2 and K1 (r>0.95, P<0.001) with slopes near unity. The correlations of BSIF and pelvic-IDIF rate constants were good (r>0.95, P<0.001), but individual errors high. In conclusion, non-invasive protocols for 15O-water PET with IDIF or PBIF accurately measures perfusion in prostate cancer and might be useful for evaluation of tumor aggressiveness and treatment response.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAmerican Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Volume8
Issue5
Pages (from-to)292-302
Number of pages11
ISSN2160-8407
Publication statusPublished - 2018

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 136118031