Non-crossing vs. independent lead times in a lost-sales inventory system with compound Poisson demand

Søren Glud Johansen, Anders Thorstenson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In this paper we provide an analysis of an inventory system with compound Poisson demand and a sequential supply system, specifically focusing on non-crossing lead times. The purpose is to facilitate a comparison with order crossing caused by independent lead times. We apply a new approach for modeling exogenous, non-crossing Erlang distributed lead times. It is assumed that the inventory is controlled by continuous review and a base-stock level. Any part of a customer demand which cannot be satisfied immediately from inventory is lost. Set-up costs are negligible and the relevant cost parameters for choosing the best base stock consist of the holding cost rate and a shortage cost per unit lost. We provide a proof that the long-run average total relevant cost is a convex function of the base stock. Hence, the base stock is easy to compute and it is optimal in the case of geometrically distributed customer demand sizes. For demand sizes which are not geometric, we suggest an approximation to specify the base stock. An approximation is also suggested for the case when the lead time is only specified by its mean and standard deviation (SD). Our numerical study shows that the average cost is very sensitive to the SD. This in sharp contrast to the complete insensitivity of SD in case of geometric demand sizes and independent lead times.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Operational Research
Volume324
Issue2
Pages (from-to)466-476
Number of pages11
ISSN0377-2217
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub / Early view - 2025

Keywords

  • Base-stock control
  • Inventory
  • Lost sales
  • Markov models
  • Non-crossing lead times

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Non-crossing vs. independent lead times in a lost-sales inventory system with compound Poisson demand'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this