Nocebo response in dentistry: A systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse events in analgesic trials of third molar removal

Takeshi Watanabe*, Mette Sieg, Sigrid Juhl Lunde, Mads Persson, Pankaj Taneja, Lene Baad-Hansen, Maria Pigg, Lene Vase

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperReviewResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The nocebo response refers to the phenomenon where nonspecific factors, including negative verbal suggestion and treatment expectations, cause adverse events (AE) following a placebo treatment. Nonspecific factors are also likely to influence AE occurrence following administration of active pharmacological treatments.

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the nocebo response in dentistry by assessing the AEs prevalence in placebo- and active arms of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing analgesic treatment following third molar (M3) surgery.

METHODS: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Eligible studies had to report the number of patients experiencing at least one drug-related AE (patients with AE ≥ 1) separately for the active and placebo arms. The proportion of patients with AE ≥ 1 and drug-related dropouts were pooled, and risk differences (RDs) between patients in the placebo- and active arm were calculated.

RESULTS: In 50 independent RCTs of 47 identified articles, the pooled rates of patients with AE ≥ 1 were 22.8% in the placebo arm and 20.6% in the active arm. The pooled rates of drug-related dropout were 0.24% in the placebo arm and 0.08% in the active arm. There were no significant RDs in patients with AE ≥ 1 and drug-related dropouts.

CONCLUSION: These results show that patients in the placebo arm reported AEs to the same extent as patients receiving active treatment, suggesting that most AEs in analgesic medication following M3 surgery may be attributed to the nocebo phenomenon.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Oral Rehabilitation
Volume50
Issue4
Pages (from-to)332-342
Number of pages11
ISSN0305-182X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2023

Keywords

  • analgesics
  • long term adverse effects
  • nocebo effect
  • oral surgery
  • pain
  • third molar
  • Analgesics
  • Nocebo Effect
  • Humans
  • Dentistry
  • Molar, Third

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nocebo response in dentistry: A systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse events in analgesic trials of third molar removal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this