Abstract
The New Public Governance approach advocates a more flexible and participatory public administration as means to higher efficiency and increased legitimacy. Increasing flexibility and thereby public employees’ discretion, however, may pose a risk to equality and impartiality, core values in democratic and rule-of-law societies. Using a survey among Baltic public employees, this article explores this risk. We ask whether public employees’ preferences for flexible rule application go hand in hand with acceptance of bending the rules, even if it means a breach of impartiality. We find that this is the case. We also find that contrary to what the New Public Governance approach expects, neither citizen participation nor generalized trust works as a control on rule bending. On a positive note, however, we find that control mechanisms associated with Weberian Public Administration lessen acceptance for bending the rules.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Public Performance and Management Review |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 648-667 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| ISSN | 1530-9576 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 3 Jul 2018 |
Keywords
- Baltic states
- New Public Governance
- flexibility
- impartiality
- meritocracy
- participation
- postcommunist
- trust