Department of Political Science

Neuro-doping and fairness

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

In this article, we critically discuss different versions of the fairness objection to the legalisation of neuro-doping. According to this objection, legalising neuro-doping will result in some enjoying an unfair advantage over others. Basically, we assess four versions. These focus on: 1) the unequal opportunities of winning for athletes who use neuro-doping and for those who do not; 2) the unfair advantages specifically for wealthy athletes; 3) the unfairness of athletic advantages not derived from athletes’ own training (conventionally understood); and 4) the unfair health care costs imposed on everyone as a result of athletes’ use of neuro-doping. We conclude that none of these versions offer a convincing principled fairness-based objection to legalising neuro-doping.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNeuroethics
Number of pages12
ISSN1874-5490
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2020

    Research areas

  • Doping, Fair play, Fairness, Neuro-doping, Sport

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 194829367