Multi-system benefits of non-invasive spinal cord stimulation following cervical spinal cord injury: a case study

  • Soshi Samejima*
  • , Claire Shackleton
  • , Raza N. Malik
  • , Ali Hosseinzadeh
  • , Lucas Rempel
  • , Anh Duong Phan
  • , Alison Williams
  • , Tom Nightingale
  • , Amandeep Ghuman
  • , Stacy Elliott
  • , Matthias Walter
  • , Klaus Krogh
  • , Michael Berger
  • , Tania Lam
  • , Rahul Sachdeva
  • , Andrei V. Krassioukov*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) impairs sensorimotor and autonomic functions. We investigated the effects of lumbosacral transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) on urinary bladder, bowel, and sexual function as well as cardiovascular and sensorimotor functions in one individual with chronic clinically motor-complete cervical SCI, 11 years post-injury. Following 30 sessions of lumbosacral tSCS, the individual presented with improved urinary bladder compliance as well as anorectal function in parallel with mitigation of the severity of autonomic dysreflexia during filling cystometry and anorectal manometry. In addition, long-term tSCS improved erectile function and sexual satisfaction. Furthermore, after long-term tSCS, concurrent tSCS enabled voluntary leg movement. This case study demonstrated the multi-system benefits of lumbosacral tSCS, which holds promise for evolving into a clinically viable therapy for restoring both autonomic and motor functions following SCI.

Original languageEnglish
Article number20
JournalBioelectronic Medicine
Volume11
Issue1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025

Keywords

  • Autonomic dysfunction
  • Motor function
  • Spinal cord injury
  • Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multi-system benefits of non-invasive spinal cord stimulation following cervical spinal cord injury: a case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this