Multi-Method Research in the Social Sciences: A Review of Recent Frameworks and a Way Forward

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperReviewResearchpeer-review

272 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article reviews recent attempts to develop multi-method social scientific frameworks. The article starts by discussing the ontological and epistemological foundations underlying case studies and variance-based approaches, differentiating approaches into bottom-up, case-based and top-down, variance-based approaches. Case-based approaches aim to learn how a causal process works within a case, whereas variance-based approaches assess mean causal effects across a set of cases. However, because of the different fundamental assumptions, it is very difficult for in-depth studies of individual cases to communicate meaningfully with claims about mean causal effects across a large set of cases. The conclusions discuss the broader challenges this distinction has for the study of comparative politics more broadly.
Original languageEnglish
JournalGovernment and Opposition
Volume55
Issue1
Pages (from-to)163-182
Number of pages20
ISSN0017-257X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • case-based
  • causal mechanisms
  • counterfactuals
  • multi-method research
  • variance-based

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multi-Method Research in the Social Sciences: A Review of Recent Frameworks and a Way Forward'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this