Aarhus University Seal

Monitoring litter and microplastics in Arctic mammals and birds

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  • A. L. Lusher, Norwegian Institute for Water Research, University of Bergen
  • ,
  • J. F. Provencher, Environment Canada
  • ,
  • J. E. Baak, McGill University
  • ,
  • B. M. Hamilton, University of Toronto
  • ,
  • K. Vorkamp
  • I. G. Hallanger, Norwegian Polar Institute
  • ,
  • L. Pijogge, Nunatsiavut Government
  • ,
  • M. Liboiron, Memorial University of Newfoundland
  • ,
  • M. P.T. Bourdages, Carleton University
  • ,
  • S. Hammer, The Faroese Environment Agency
  • ,
  • M. Gavrilo, Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, Association Maritime Heritage
  • ,
  • J. C. Vermaire, Carleton University
  • ,
  • J. F. Linnebjerg
  • M. L. Mallory, Acadia University
  • ,
  • G. W. Gabrielsen, Norwegian Polar Institute

Plastic pollution has been reported to affect Arctic mammals and birds. There are strengths and limitations to monitoring litter and microplastics using Arctic mammals and birds. One strength is the direct use of these data to understand the potential impacts on Arctic biodiversity as well as effects on human health, if selected species are consumed. Monitoring programs must be practically designed with all purposes in mind, and a spectrum of approaches and species will be required. Spatial and temporal trends of plastic pollution can be built on the information obtained from studies on northern fulmars (Fulmarus glacialis (Linnaeus, 1761)), a species that is an environmental indicator. To increase our understanding of the potential implications for human health, the species and locations chosen for monitoring should be selected based on the priorities of local communities. Monitoring programs under development should examine species for population level impacts in Arctic mammals and birds. Mammals and birds can be useful in source and surveillance monitoring via locally designed monitoring programs. We recommend future programs consider a range of monitoring objectives with mammals and birds as part of the suite of tools for monitoring litter and microplastics, plastic chemical additives, and effects, and for understanding sources.

Original languageEnglish
JournalArctic Science
Volume8
Issue4
Pages (from-to)1217-1235
Number of pages19
ISSN2368-7460
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Authors Lusher, Baak, Hamilton, Vorkamp, Hallanger, Pijogge, Liboiron, Bourdages, Hammer, Sjúrður; Gavrilo, Vermaire, Linnebjerg, Mallory, and Gabrielsen, and The Crown.

    Research areas

  • contamination, debris, marine litter, plastic, wild food

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 293092085